Asus P5QC

Performance Results


Gaming 17% Surfboard	Desktop 58% Gunboat	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	29% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	48.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus P5QC (all builds)
Memory	4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20090427
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Apr 28 '24 at 11:10
Run Duration	131 Seconds
Run User	UKR-User
Background CPU	3%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Quad Q8200-$49 19,990 User benchmarks, average bench 43% LGA 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.35 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	49.8% Average	Memory 76 1-Core 36.8 2-Core 72.9 42% 61.9 Pts	4-Core 140 8-Core 139 19% 139 Pts	64-Core 140 9% 140 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 49.8% Great: 50%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Asus(1043 8626) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 536.23 Performing below potential (59^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	29% Poor	Lighting 36.6 Reflection 40.2 Parallax 38.2 30% 38.3 fps	MRender 38.2 Gravity 38.1 Splatting 27.2 28% 34.5 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 29% Great: 33%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SUV500120G 120GB 4,749 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 97GB free (System drive) Firmware: 003056RI SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 69 78 66 78 65 MB/s Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	48.5% Average	Read 218 Write 210 Mixed 177 SusWrite 79.7 38% 171 MB/s	4K Read 28.4 4K Write 41.3 4K Mixed 30.8 104% 33.5 MB/s	DQ Read 35.3 DQ Write 70.9 DQ Mixed 41.8 35% 49.3 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 48.5% Great: 83%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR2 Performing below potential (22^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	22% Poor	MC Read 7.6 MC Write 6.4 MC Mixed 6.6 20% 6.87 GB/s	SC Read 6.5 SC Write 6.5 SC Mixed 7.1 19% 6.7 GB/s	Latency 90.4 44% 90.4 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 22% Great: 65%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	70	58	60	27.2"	1280 720	GSM5986 27EA73

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P5QC Builds (Compare 126 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5QC

CPU
Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples	37x
Core2 Quad Q9650Intel $170Bench 51%, 16,719 samples	12x
Core2 Quad Q9400Intel $170Bench 46%, 24,176 samples	10x

GPU
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	8x
GTX 550-TiNvidia $250Bench 9%, 54,392 samples	6x
GeForce GT 630NvidiaBench 4%, 60,212 samples	5x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	12x
Blue 250GBWD $90Bench 79%, 26,761 samples	5x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	5x

RAM
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	41x
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	36x
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	22x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 52% - Above average

Total price: $189

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16