Megaport MS-7C51

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	32.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

System	Megaport MS-7C51 (all builds)
Motherboard	Micro-Star A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51)
Memory	11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20191108
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 28 '24 at 08:23
Run Duration	266 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	5%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3500X-$160 33,544 User benchmarks, average bench 82% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	89.9% Excellent	Memory 77.9 1-Core 138 2-Core 274 88% 164 Pts	4-Core 548 8-Core 800 84% 674 Pts	64-Core 816 50% 816 Pts
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 89.9% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% MSI(1462 3351) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 551.86 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	32.2% Below average	Lighting 42.1 Reflection 41.1 Parallax 38.7 34% 40.6 fps	MRender 37 Gravity 41.3 Splatting 27.2 28% 35.2 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 32.2% Great: 33%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 120GB-$109 51,792 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 65GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXT08B0Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 476 Write 134 Mixed 130 53% 247 MB/s	4K Read 28.6 4K Write 92.2 4K Mixed 20.8 119% 47.2 MB/s	DQ Read 322 DQ Write 127 DQ Mixed 49.6 83% 166 MB/s
Poor: 46% Great: 73%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB 179,769 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 931GB free Firmware: JU0A0E Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 140 Write 132 Mixed 54.1 80% 109 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 7.3 4K Mixed 0.4 230% 2.97 MB/s
Poor: 27% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A1K43EB2-CWE M378A1K43CB2-CTD 16GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 2667, 2667 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	79.2% Very good	MC Read 34.4 MC Write 20 MC Mixed 30.9 81% 28.4 GB/s	SC Read 22.7 SC Write 20 SC Mixed 30.2 69% 24.3 GB/s	Latency 84.4 47% 84.4 ns
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 79.2% Great: 88%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	68	56	30	31.5"	1280 720	ELD6886 TV_MONITOR

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MS-7C51 Builds (Compare 132 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 73%

Battleship

Desktop 84%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 62%

Destroyer

System: Megaport MS-7C51

CPU
Ryzen 5 3500XAMD $160Bench 82%, 33,544 samples	53x
Ryzen 5 2600XAMD $175Bench 74%, 142,983 samples	29x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $145Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	16x

GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia $273Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	34x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $195Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	33x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	16x

SSD
SU630 240GBAdataBench 64%, 60,212 samples	31x
SU650 240GBAdata $70Bench 70%, 47,016 samples	22x
BX500 240GBCrucial $27Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	8x

RAM
1x16GBAdataBench 47%, 6,485 samples	36x
CT16G4DFRA266.M8FB 1x16GBCrucialBench 47%, 310 samples	26x
Aegis DDR4 2666 C19 1x16GBG.SKILLBench 47%, 2,199 samples	16x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 84% - Excellent

Total price: $433

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16