PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
Graphics | 53.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 65.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus A88XM-A (all builds) |
Memory | 10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit väriä |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20160309 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Apr 28 '24 at 04:51 |
Run Duration | 119 Seconds |
Run User | FIN-User |
Background CPU | 9% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD A10-7870K APU (2014 D.Ka)-$135
FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
|
38.3%
Below average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing below potential (77th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
53.2%
Above average
|
|||
Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
HyperX Savage 240GB-$120
52GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM00.U
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 125 125 135 142 150 MB/s
|
65.2%
Good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Corsair CML16GX3M2A1600C9 16GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
|
33%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 67 | 54 | 60 | 23.8" | 1280 720 | FUS087F B24-8 TS Pro |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
A8-6600K APUAMD $88Bench 50%, 21,890 samples | 54x |
Athlon II X4 860KAMD $51Bench 45%, 29,887 samples | 39x |
A10-7850K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMD $135Bench 45%, 19,875 samples | 38x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 22,117 samples | 31x |
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 25,284 samples | 31x |
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 19x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 57% - Above average | Total price: $178 |