Asrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	134% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Motherboard	Asrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4 (all builds)
Memory	25 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20240222
Uptime	4.9 Days
Run Date	Apr 28 '24 at 02:06
Run Duration	167 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	9%

Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$115 383,420 User benchmarks, average bench 96% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	98.3% Outstanding	Memory 81.5 1-Core 161 2-Core 322 100% 188 Pts	4-Core 618 8-Core 903 95% 760 Pts	64-Core 1,134 70% 1,134 Pts
Poor: 83% ↑ This bench: 98.3% Great: 107%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340 442,467 User benchmarks, average bench 128% Nvidia(10DE 153C) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3600 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 552.22 Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	134% Outstanding	Lighting 193 Reflection 167 Parallax 160 158% 173 fps	MRender 186 Gravity 130 Splatting 112 113% 143 fps
Poor: 116% ↑ This bench: 134% Great: 136%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Nvme KINGSTON SNVS500 500GB 821 User benchmarks, average bench 156% 126GB free (System drive) Firmware: EDFK0N01 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 976 Write 433 Mixed 528 142% 646 MB/s	4K Read 31.6 4K Write 96.4 4K Mixed 41.6 152% 56.5 MB/s	DQ Read 896 DQ Write 549 DQ Mixed 627 493% 691 MB/s
Poor: 94% Great: 216%
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$104 129,044 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 582GB free Firmware: SVT01B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 454 Write 342 Mixed 426 91% 407 MB/s	4K Read 38.6 4K Write 66.5 4K Mixed 47.4 154% 50.8 MB/s	DQ Read 246 DQ Write 200 DQ Mixed 221 166% 223 MB/s
Poor: 82% Great: 137%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 32GB 34,316 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 29GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 34.9 Write 21.6 Mixed 13.7 27% 23.4 MB/s	4K Read 4.8 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 2 171% 3.1 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 18%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMH32GX4M2Z3600C18 2x16GB 7,413 User benchmarks, average bench 97% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	102% Outstanding	MC Read 45.2 MC Write 26.7 MC Mixed 39.9 106% 37.3 GB/s	SC Read 26.3 SC Write 24 SC Mixed 35.4 82% 28.6 GB/s	Latency 70.4 57% 70.4 ns
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 123%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 38: 0P 3R 5G 8B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
38%	37%	43	214	58	144	27"	2560 1417	AUS2705 VG27AQL1A

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X570 Phantom Gaming 4 Builds (Compare 2,879 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 124%

UFO

Desktop 90%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 117%

UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4

CPU
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $84Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	507x
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	488x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $115Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	362x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $488Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	242x
RTX 3080Nvidia $909Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	189x
RX 5700-XTAMD $250Bench 98%, 254,908 samples	162x

SSD
Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBWD $74Bench 228%, 180,890 samples	112x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	102x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	70x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	100x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 89%, 92,468 samples	74x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	73x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $691

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16