Asrock B760M-C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 163%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 116%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 182%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 120%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics138% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive238% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsrock B760M-C  (all builds)
MotherboardASRock B760M-C
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230217
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 28 '24 at 01:43
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-13600KF-$235
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.85 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
120% Outstanding
Memory 79.9
1-Core 212
2-Core 424
123% 239 Pts
4-Core 852
8-Core 1,524
143% 1188 Pts
64-Core 2,486
154% 2,486 Pts
Poor: 117%
This bench: 120%
Great: 127%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Gigabyte(1458 40CE) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
138% Outstanding
Lighting 191
Reflection 234
Parallax 172
156% 199 fps
MRender 233
Gravity 140
Splatting 121
130% 165 fps
Poor: 121%
This bench: 138%
Great: 139%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata LEGEND 700 1TB
755GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T1103L0L
SusWrite @10s intervals: 991 1424 939 1555 1038 1594 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
238% Outstanding
Read 1,376
Write 1549
Mixed 970
SusWrite 1,257
290% 1,288 MB/s
4K Read 42.9
4K Write 253
4K Mixed 24.3
230% 107 MB/s
DQ Read 844
DQ Write 1,021
DQ Mixed 466
481% 777 MB/s
Poor: 109%
This bench: 238%
Great: 283%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Gold Key Co Ltd NMGD516F81-5200N 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 5200 MHz
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
87.5% Excellent
MC Read 35.4
MC Write 30.9
MC Mixed 29.2
91% 31.8 GB/s
SC Read 19.4
SC Write 32.8
SC Mixed 23.6
72% 25.3 GB/s
Latency 79.9
50% 79.9 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 87.5%
Great: 93%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 20 215 57 60 24" 1280 720 DELA02B DELL 2408WFP
Typical B760M-C Builds (Compare 85 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 148%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 170%
UFO

System: Asrock B760M-C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $687
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback