Extra exone go Expert 1730 X13

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 169%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 111%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 167%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 106%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics160% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive356% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
1 month ago, 1 month ago.
SystemExtra exone go Expert 1730 X13  (all builds)
MotherboardNotebook V15x_V17xRNx
Memory26 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230509
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 27 '24 at 22:54
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-13620H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
106% Outstanding
Memory 73.6
1-Core 203
2-Core 404
116% 227 Pts
4-Core 738
8-Core 1,149
116% 943 Pts
64-Core 1,558
96% 1,558 Pts
Poor: 94%
This bench: 106%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070 (Laptop)
Clevo(1558 0157) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3300 MHz, MLim: 4150 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
160% Outstanding
Lighting 224
Reflection 198
Parallax 220
183% 214 fps
MRender 300
Gravity 186
Splatting 132
160% 206 fps
Poor: 94%
This bench: 160%
Great: 152%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Samsung SSD 970 2TB
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1502 1492 1488 1490 1477 1466 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
356% Outstanding
Read 2,664
Write 2,104
Mixed 1856
SusWrite 1,486
454% 2,028 MB/s
4K Read 68.6
4K Write 185
4K Mixed 97.6
327% 117 MB/s
DQ Read 1,525
DQ Write 1,056
DQ Mixed 1,248
943% 1,276 MB/s
Poor: 221%
This bench: 356%
Great: 431%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M425R2GA3BB0-CQKOL 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
156% Outstanding
MC Read 63
MC Write 63.1
MC Mixed 56.6
174% 60.9 GB/s
SC Read 21.9
SC Write 49.5
SC Mixed 30
97% 33.8 GB/s
Latency 95.6
42% 95.6 ns
Poor: 95%
This bench: 156%
Great: 151%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 144 17.3" 1280 720 BOE09EE
Typical exone go Expert 1730 X13 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 138%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 139%
UFO

System: Extra exone go Expert 1730 X13

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback