MSI MPG B550 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C56)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 126%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 113%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 127%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 111%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics111% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive204% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C56
MotherboardMSI MPG B550 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C56)  (all builds)
Memory10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240311
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateApr 27 '24 at 21:09
Run Duration224 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X-$168
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Memory 93.5
1-Core 176
2-Core 357
112% 209 Pts
4-Core 689
8-Core 1,274
117% 982 Pts
64-Core 1,645
102% 1,645 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 111%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
Nvidia(10DE 1F02) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2295 MHz, MLim: 3600 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
111% Outstanding
Lighting 138
Reflection 127
Parallax 141
113% 135 fps
MRender 180
Gravity 135
Splatting 115
114% 144 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 111%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$68
266GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1873 412 139 272 293 294 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
204% Outstanding
Read 1,595
Write 1,722
Mixed 1,641
SusWrite 547
309% 1,376 MB/s
4K Read 47.9
4K Write 89.3
4K Mixed 60.8
198% 66 MB/s
DQ Read 1,184
DQ Write 867
DQ Mixed 997
753% 1,016 MB/s
Poor: 144%
This bench: 204%
Great: 295%
Intenso SSD 250GB
205GB free
Firmware: W0714A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 452 449 451 453 455 454 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
95.7% Outstanding
Read 508
Write 460
Mixed 420
SusWrite 452
104% 460 MB/s
4K Read 31.5
4K Write 84.1
4K Mixed 24.4
124% 46.7 MB/s
DQ Read 155
DQ Write 347
DQ Mixed 35.4
88% 179 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 95.7%
Great: 236%
Fikwot FN950 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: SN14081
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2064 2114 2111 2116 2109 2119 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
339% Outstanding
Read 2,334
Write 2,228
Mixed 1,990
SusWrite 2,105
488% 2,164 MB/s
4K Read 53.1
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 67.8
222% 74.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,292
DQ Write 870
DQ Mixed 998
767% 1,053 MB/s
Poor: 245%
This bench: 339%
Great: 560%
Samsung HD502IJ 500GB-$40
264GB free
Firmware: 1AA01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 116 115 115 114 116 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
55.4% Above average
Read 78.2
Write 85.9
Mixed 56.5
SusWrite 115
62% 83.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
176% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$40
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
96.7% Outstanding
MC Read 38.5
MC Write 27
MC Mixed 36.1
97% 33.9 GB/s
SC Read 32.8
SC Write 26.7
SC Mixed 40
95% 33.2 GB/s
Latency 65.1
62% 65.1 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 96.7%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 120 23.5" 1280 720 AOC2401 24G1WG4
Typical MPG B550 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C56) Builds (Compare 16,033 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: MSI MPG B550 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C56) - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 104% - Outstanding Total price: $679
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback