HP ProBook 470 G5

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Graphics6.87% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive33% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP ProBook 470 G5  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 837F
Memory0.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230329
Uptime3.4 Days
Run DateApr 27 '24 at 20:41
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8250U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 46.1
2-Core 97.5
32% 71.8 Pts
4-Core 138
8-Core 196
21% 167 Pts
64-Core 201
12% 201 Pts
Poor: 26% Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia 930MX
HP(103C 8380) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.1669
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
6.87% Terrible
Lighting 8.4
Reflection 11.3
Parallax 8.5
7% 9.4 fps
MRender 5.7
Gravity 11.7
Splatting 7.9
7% 8.43 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 6.87%
Great: 9%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SK hynix PC401 HFS256GD9TNG-62A0A 256GB
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80000E00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 68 57 68 64 56 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
33% Below average
Read 348
Write 74.5
Mixed 113
SusWrite 65
33% 150 MB/s
4K Read 7.9
4K Write 16.3
4K Mixed 10.6
34% 11.6 MB/s
DQ Read 122
DQ Write 78.3
DQ Mixed 107
78% 103 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 33%
Great: 163%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
14.2% Very poor
MC Read 4.7
MC Write 5.9
MC Mixed 5.5
15% 5.37 GB/s
SC Read 1.5
SC Write 3.7
SC Mixed 0.8
6% 2 GB/s
Latency 265
15% 265 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 14.2%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 1: 0P 0R 0G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
1% 6% 16 121 28 60 23" 1280 720 HPN345F HP E233
Typical ProBook 470 G5 Builds (Compare 616 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProBook 470 G5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback