Dell Precision Tower 5810

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 118%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 108%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics133% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive187% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDell Precision Tower 5810
MotherboardDell Precision Tower 5810  (all builds)
Memory13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180202
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 27 '24 at 18:52
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
SOCKET 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
87% Excellent
Memory 85.9
1-Core 117
2-Core 233
82% 145 Pts
4-Core 473
8-Core 786
77% 629 Pts
64-Core 938
58% 938 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 87%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080S (Super)-$466
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3875 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 457.51
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
133% Outstanding
Lighting 180
Reflection 181
Parallax 200
147% 187 fps
MRender 202
Gravity 160
Splatting 130
130% 164 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 133%
Great: 139%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kxg6aznv512g TOSHIBA 512GB
432GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5108AGLA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1025 844 811 815 816 818 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
187% Outstanding
Read 986
Write 878
Mixed 866
SusWrite 855
202% 896 MB/s
4K Read 37.9
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 58.7
186% 66.1 MB/s
DQ Read 952
DQ Write 708
DQ Mixed 829
620% 830 MB/s
Poor: 120%
This bench: 187%
Great: 257%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 9ASF51272PZ-2G3B1 4x4GB
4 of 8 slots used
16GB RIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
105% Outstanding
MC Read 39.2
MC Write 46.2
MC Mixed 37
117% 40.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 20.3
SC Mixed 20
52% 18.1 GB/s
Latency 71.4
56% 71.4 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 105%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 27" 1280 720 VSC3C3A XG270Q
Typical Precision Tower 5810 Builds (Compare 5,317 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Dell Precision Tower 5810

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 28% - Poor Total price: $76
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback