TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 96%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics116% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive84.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory21.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220225
Uptime10.6 Days
Run DateApr 27 '24 at 18:39
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$81
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
82.8% Excellent
Memory 70.4
1-Core 134
2-Core 266
84% 157 Pts
4-Core 511
8-Core 835
82% 673 Pts
64-Core 1,036
64% 1,036 Pts
Poor: 73% ↑
This bench: 82.8%
 Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6700-XT-$480
PowerColor(148C 2310) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 12GB, Driver: 24.3.1
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
116% Outstanding
Lighting 125
Reflection 131
Parallax 257
102% 171 fps
MRender 228
Gravity 140
Splatting 195
154% 188 fps
Poor: 113% ↑
This bench: 116%
 Great: 129%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
512gb SATA SSD 512GB
247GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1022A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 382 384 391 393 395 397 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
84.2% Excellent
Read 498
Write 383
Mixed 380
SusWrite 390
93% 413 MB/s
4K Read 23.3
4K Write 79.7
4K Mixed 23.8
108% 42.3 MB/s
DQ Read 179
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 36.7
68% 134 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑
This bench: 84.2%
 Great: 95%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
202GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 134 133 103 109 100 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
51.3% Above average
Read 65.8
Write 119
Mixed 69.8
SusWrite 113
68% 92 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.1
66% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑
This bench: 51.3%
 Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB-$63
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
68.4% Good
MC Read 28.1
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 27.3
70% 24.5 GB/s
SC Read 21.3
SC Write 16.8
SC Mixed 26.6
62% 21.6 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 59% ↑
This bench: 68.4%
 Great: 111%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 16: 0P 2R 0G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
16% 9% 93 74 10 60 72.3" 1280 720 TSB0206 TOSHIBA-TV
Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,056 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $105

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD  $190Bench 86%, 635,419 samples4,683x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD  $190Bench 98%, 128,080 samples4,318x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD  $120Bench 96%, 383,420 samples3,448x
GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia  $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples2,259x
RTX 3080Nvidia  $700Bench 187%, 424,051 samples2,089x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia  $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples1,476x
SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung  $102Bench 310%, 455,997 samples1,850x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung  $105Bench 394%, 276,089 samples1,110x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung  $159Bench 297%, 331,647 samples869x
RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair  $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples776x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair  $55Bench 85%, 346,786 samples731x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair  $120Bench 89%, 144,399 samples650x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $937
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback