HP EliteDesk 705 G2 SFF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics4.35% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP EliteDesk 705 G2 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 805A
Memory10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20160124
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 27 '24 at 15:25
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User LBN-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD PRO A4-8350B R5, 6 Compute Cores 2C+4G
XU1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
38.5% Below average
Memory 61.7
1-Core 61.5
2-Core 87.7
44% 70.3 Pts
4-Core 91.1
8-Core 92.6
12% 91.8 Pts
64-Core 90.5
6% 90.5 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
HP(103C 805A) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
4.35% Terrible
Lighting 5
Reflection 5.4
Parallax 6.6
4% 5.67 fps
MRender 4.5
Gravity 5.2
Splatting 7.5
5% 5.73 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.35%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA400S37480GB 480GB
380GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 109R10A0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 260
Write 311
Mixed 241
61% 271 MB/s
4K Read 19.2
4K Write 43.2
4K Mixed 7.8
62% 23.4 MB/s
DQ Read 137
DQ Write 96.2
DQ Mixed 15.9
39% 83.1 MB/s
Poor: 34% Great: 94%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5173EB0-YK0 Kingston 99U5584-009.A00LF Kingston 99U5584-009.A00LF Kingston 99U5584-009.A00LF 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
25.3% Poor
MC Read 9.1
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 9.8
24% 8.53 GB/s
SC Read 6.3
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 9.3
21% 7.5 GB/s
Latency 119
34% 119 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 40 16 60 18.9" 1280 720 HWP3117 HP E190i
Typical EliteDesk 705 G2 SFF Builds (Compare 184 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 705 G2 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback