Asrock H61M-VG4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	50.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asrock H61M-VG4 (all builds)
Memory	2.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130513
Uptime	5.9 Days
Run Date	Apr 27 '24 at 14:05
Run Duration	168 Seconds
Run User	HUN-User
Background CPU	5%

Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3330 51,926 User benchmarks, average bench 61% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 1.45 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	49.4% Average	Memory 81.2 1-Core 67.4 2-Core 116 56% 88.1 Pts	4-Core 109 8-Core 90.5 14% 99.8 Pts	64-Core 80.1 5% 80.1 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 49.4% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Asus(1043 0525) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1360 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.20.27.09 Performing below potential (50^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	50.5% Above average	Lighting 63.7 Reflection 57.7 Parallax 87.6 52% 69.7 fps	MRender 60.6 Gravity 72.7 Splatting 46.7 48% 60 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 50.5% Great: 56%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89 105,079 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 130GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0C3J96R9 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	Read 250 Write 234 Mixed 35.3 38% 173 MB/s	4K Read 21.1 4K Write 39.2 4K Mixed 25.4 85% 28.6 MB/s	DQ Read 177 DQ Write 190 DQ Mixed 115 106% 161 MB/s
Poor: 49% Great: 88%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 812GB free Firmware: MS2OA750 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 166 Write 176 Mixed 30.8 90% 124 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.5 124% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 47% Great: 107%
ADATA USB Flash Drive 64GB 329 User benchmarks, average bench 21% 58GB free, PID dd1a Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 28.9 Write 14.9 Mixed 26.7 29% 23.5 MB/s	4K Read 4.8 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 2.4 150% 2.9 MB/s
Poor: 8% Great: 36%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5471-051.A00LF 1x8GB 194 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1067 MHz Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	22.2% Poor	MC Read 6.6 MC Write 7.2 MC Mixed 6.4 19% 6.73 GB/s	SC Read 6.8 SC Write 7.6 SC Mixed 6.7 20% 7.03 GB/s	Latency 81.5 49% 81.5 ns
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 22.2% Great: 30%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	44	8	60	21.5"	1280 720	DELA114 DELL P2219H

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H61M-VG4 Builds (Compare 437 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 24%

Surfboard

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock H61M-VG4

CPU
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	70x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	51x
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	25x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	36x
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	27x
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	27x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	19x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	11x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	10x

RAM
M2F4G64CB8HG4N-DI Samsung M378B5273DH0-CK0 8GBUnknownBench 63%, 31 samples	13x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	9x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 91% - Outstanding

Total price: $146

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16