MSI PRO H510M-B (MS-7E05)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics6.35% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive77.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7E05
MotherboardMSI PRO H510M-B (MS-7E05)  (all builds)
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231018
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 27 '24 at 14:04
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10400-$124
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
87.6% Excellent
Memory 93.9
1-Core 108
2-Core 245
84% 149 Pts
4-Core 439
8-Core 649
68% 544 Pts
64-Core 986
61% 986 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 87.6%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
MSI(1462 7E05) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
6.35% Terrible
Lighting 6.3
Reflection 8.8
Parallax 7.2
5% 7.43 fps
MRender 12.1
Gravity 5.9
Splatting 13.1
9% 10.4 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.35%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN256HCHP-000H1 256GB
191GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02H0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 254 222 226 228 239 233 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
77.9% Very good
Read 354
Write 256
Mixed 223
SusWrite 234
60% 267 MB/s
4K Read 28.7
4K Write 48.2
4K Mixed 33.3
112% 36.7 MB/s
DQ Read 369
DQ Write 294
DQ Mixed 200
185% 288 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 77.9%
Great: 102%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 32GB
21GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 29 31 31 33 33 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
42.4% Average
Read 204
Write 31.9
Mixed 43.3
SusWrite 31.4
76% 77.6 MB/s
4K Read 9.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 1.4
124% 4.07 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF2666C16D4/8G 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
75.3% Very good
MC Read 30.3
MC Write 28.1
MC Mixed 22.4
77% 26.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 27.4
SC Mixed 20.7
60% 20.8 GB/s
Latency 63.9
63% 63.9 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 59 60 23" 1280 720 HWP327A HP E232
Typical PRO H510M-B (MS-7E05) Builds (Compare 521 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI PRO H510M-B (MS-7E05)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 113% - Outstanding Total price: $98
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback