MSI PRO B760M-P (MS-7E02)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 108%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 106%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 114%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics86.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7E02
MotherboardMSI PRO B760M-P (MS-7E02)  (all builds)
Memory21.9 GB free of 32 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231110
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 27 '24 at 13:28
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-14600KF-$294
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
114% Outstanding
Memory 84
1-Core 207
2-Core 406
121% 232 Pts
4-Core 770
8-Core 1,315
126% 1,042 Pts
64-Core 2,205
136% 2,205 Pts
Poor: 119%
This bench: 114%
Great: 129%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6600-$330
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 24.3.1
Performing below potential (77th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
86.6% Excellent
Lighting 85.8
Reflection 134
Parallax 162
70% 127 fps
MRender 194
Gravity 89.4
Splatting 153
119% 146 fps
Poor: 83%
This bench: 86.6%
Great: 91%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$68
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,708
Write 1,994
Mixed 1687
402% 1,796 MB/s
4K Read 56.1
4K Write 195
4K Mixed 91.4
305% 114 MB/s
DQ Read 1,589
DQ Write 1,214
DQ Mixed 815
769% 1,206 MB/s
Poor: 144% Great: 295%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
662GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 118 120 120 120 119 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
84.9% Excellent
Read 176
Write 179
Mixed 35.5
SusWrite 119
92% 128 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.5
124% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 84.9%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AX5U6000C3016G-DTLAB 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
182% Outstanding
MC Read 74.9
MC Write 71.2
MC Mixed 68.9
205% 71.7 GB/s
SC Read 22.4
SC Write 50.8
SC Mixed 32.6
101% 35.3 GB/s
Latency 74.7
54% 74.7 ns
Poor: 146%
This bench: 182%
Great: 239%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 31: 0P 3R 3G 7B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
31% 18% 72 210 56 180 24.5" 1920 1009 MSI3BC0 MSI G255F
Typical PRO B760M-P (MS-7E02) Builds (Compare 441 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 123%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 115%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI PRO B760M-P (MS-7E02)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 106% - Outstanding Total price: $415
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback