HP OMEN by HP Gaming Laptop 16-wf1xxx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics9.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
1 month ago, 1 month ago.
SystemHP OMEN by HP Gaming Laptop 16-wf1xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8C77
Memory22.3 GB free of 32 GB
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231110
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 27 '24 at 11:58
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-14700HX
U3E1, 1 CPU, 20 cores, 28 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Memory 74.4
1-Core 182
2-Core 370
108% 209 Pts
4-Core 713
8-Core 1,130
113% 921 Pts
64-Core 1,937
120% 1,937 Pts
Poor: 99%
This bench: 104%
Great: 120%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
HP(103C 8C77) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4953
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
9.1% Terrible
Lighting 10.1
Reflection 15
Parallax 10.9
8% 12 fps
MRender 14.1
Gravity 14.7
Splatting 11.4
11% 13.4 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 9.1%
Great: 10%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N 1TB
895GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS1
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 4,121
Write 3,170
Mixed 2,544
726% 3,279 MB/s
4K Read 52.4
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 72.5
235% 81.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,248
DQ Write 621
DQ Mixed 855
656% 908 MB/s
Poor: 173% Great: 516%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMCG78AGBSA095N 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 5600 MHz
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
167% Outstanding
MC Read 72.5
MC Write 62.6
MC Mixed 64.9
190% 66.7 GB/s
SC Read 18.6
SC Write 41.9
SC Mixed 26.3
83% 28.9 GB/s
Latency 93.3
43% 93.3 ns
Poor: 117%
This bench: 167%
Great: 177%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 44 8 240 16" 1280 720 BOE0B7D
Typical OMEN by HP Gaming Laptop 16-wf1xxx Builds (Compare 19 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 148%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 114%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 170%
UFO

System: HP OMEN by HP Gaming Laptop 16-wf1xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback