Dell Latitude E6420

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.23% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDell Latitude E6420  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 032T9K
Memory0.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170512
Uptime3.7 Days
Run DateApr 27 '24 at 10:02
Run Duration97 Seconds
Run User PAK-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2410M-$160
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
50.6% Above average
Memory 80.9
1-Core 64.2
2-Core 102
53% 82.3 Pts
4-Core 120
8-Core 125
16% 123 Pts
64-Core 116
7% 116 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia NVS 4200M
Dell(1028 0493) 512MB
CLim: 740 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 512MB, Driver: 392.61
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
1.23% Terrible
Lighting 1.3
Reflection 3.4
Parallax 0.9
1% 1.87 fps
MRender 2.9
Gravity 0.9
Splatting 2
2% 1.93 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.23%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hs-ssd-e100 128G 128GB
13GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN12875
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 426
Write 375
Mixed 388
88% 397 MB/s
4K Read 21.6
4K Write 49.7
4K Mixed 27.1
94% 32.8 MB/s
DQ Read 116
DQ Write 209
DQ Mixed 168
126% 164 MB/s
Poor: 41% Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16KTF51264HZ-1G4K1 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
25.5% Poor
MC Read 8.1
MC Write 8.2
MC Mixed 8
23% 8.1 GB/s
SC Read 6.8
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 7.7
22% 7.6 GB/s
Latency 82.5
48% 82.5 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 25.5%
Great: 30%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 15: 0P 3R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
15% 12% 25 50 28 60 14" 1280 720 SEC544B
Typical Latitude E6420 Builds (Compare 2,171 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Latitude E6420

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $62
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback