Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	98.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) (all builds)
Memory	17.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20200401
Uptime	2 Days
Run Date	Apr 27 '24 at 05:39
Run Duration	108 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	29%

Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$83 1,072,639 User benchmarks, average bench 83% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.95 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	77.7% Very good	Memory 71.8 1-Core 130 2-Core 244 81% 148 Pts	4-Core 448 8-Core 804 75% 626 Pts	64-Core 980 61% 980 Pts
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 77.7% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200 478,117 User benchmarks, average bench 104% Gigabyte(1458 3FDA) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 545.92 Performing below potential (20^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	98.2% Outstanding	Lighting 118 Reflection 111 Parallax 123 96% 117 fps	MRender 172 Gravity 116 Splatting 102 103% 130 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 98.2% Great: 112%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HP EX950 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$126 5,166 User benchmarks, average bench 284% 65GB free (System drive) Firmware: SS0411B Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 2,222 Write 1,130 Mixed 146 252% 1,166 MB/s	4K Read 48.7 4K Write 47.7 4K Mixed 40.7 151% 45.7 MB/s	DQ Read 980 DQ Write 132 DQ Mixed 239 256% 450 MB/s
Poor: 170% Great: 380%
Crucial P2 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$122 7,464 User benchmarks, average bench 217% 58GB free Firmware: P2CR033 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 976 Write 1,361 Mixed 1,150 262% 1,163 MB/s	4K Read 40.2 4K Write 35.4 4K Mixed 39.1 130% 38.2 MB/s	DQ Read 1013 DQ Write 121 DQ Mixed 225 251% 453 MB/s
Poor: 129% Great: 307%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Patriot 3200 C16 Series 2x16GB 2,697 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	69.3% Good	MC Read 28.5 MC Write 19.4 MC Mixed 27.4 72% 25.1 GB/s	SC Read 19.4 SC Write 18.2 SC Mixed 23.8 58% 20.5 GB/s	Latency 99.9 40% 99.9 ns
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 69.3% Great: 110%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 15: 0P 1R 1G 7B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
15%	82%	11	192	13	200	29.5"	2560 1057	MSI3CB4 MSI MAG301CR2

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 25,878 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 129%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $191

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	4,658x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $175Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	4,274x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $115Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	3,421x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	2,242x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	2,078x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	1,472x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	1,840x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $107Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	1,106x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $150Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	867x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	772x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $55Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	727x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $114Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	646x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $1,036

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16