HP Z4 G4 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics69.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive74.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Z4 G4 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 81C5
Memory24.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180521
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateApr 27 '24 at 01:22
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon W-2104
CPU0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
64.3% Good
Memory 63
1-Core 69.7
2-Core 176
57% 103 Pts
4-Core 378
8-Core 379
51% 379 Pts
64-Core 375
23% 375 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P4000
HP(103C 11A3) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1708 MHz, MLim: 1901 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 391.33
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
69.7% Good
Lighting 82.6
Reflection 90.8
Parallax 83.4
67% 85.6 fps
MRender 86.1
Gravity 88.6
Splatting 95
74% 89.9 fps
Poor: 64%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 70%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SA510 2.5 1000GB
620GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 52046100
SusWrite @10s intervals: 372 385 279 283 279 284 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
74.2% Very good
Read 420
Write 415
Mixed 398
SusWrite 314
87% 387 MB/s
4K Read 22
4K Write 55.3
4K Mixed 25.6
95% 34.3 MB/s
DQ Read 345
DQ Write 57.6
DQ Mixed 276
183% 226 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A1K43BB1-CTD 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
75.3% Very good
MC Read 19.5
MC Write 47.9
MC Mixed 23.7
87% 30.4 GB/s
SC Read 6
SC Write 14.4
SC Mixed 8.1
27% 9.5 GB/s
Latency 126
32% 126 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 11: 0P 1R 1G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
11% 10% 51 173 25 60 23.5" 1280 720 VSCF332 VG2449 Series
Typical Z4 G4 Workstation Builds (Compare 3,083 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft

System: HP Z4 G4 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback