Pcspecialist Amd Am4 Gen3

Performance Results


Gaming 60% Gunboat	Desktop 88% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 60% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	65.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	41.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Pcspecialist Amd Am4 Gen3 (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK PRIME B450-PLUS
Memory	7.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210713
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Apr 26 '24 at 23:05
Run Duration	122 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	17%

Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$205 635,419 User benchmarks, average bench 86% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	87.3% Excellent	Memory 74.5 1-Core 145 2-Core 284 90% 168 Pts	4-Core 537 8-Core 914 88% 725 Pts	64-Core 1,406 87% 1,406 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 87.3% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$209 230,793 User benchmarks, average bench 68% EVGA(3842 1167) CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 552.12 Performing below potential (22^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	65.2% Good	Lighting 87.6 Reflection 83.8 Parallax 72.6 71% 81.3 fps	MRender 54.2 Gravity 73 Splatting 66 53% 64.4 fps
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 65.2% Great: 73%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
1TB PCS 2.5" SSD 1TB 370 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 157GB free (System drive) Firmware: U0701A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 68 1.9 64 170 11 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	41.4% Average	Read 485 Write 193 Mixed 256 SusWrite 78.5 56% 253 MB/s	4K Read 22.3 4K Write 7.9 4K Mixed 14.5 57% 14.9 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 41.4% Great: 101%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49 257,835 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 650GB free Firmware: 05.01D05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 117 115 117 115 119 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	58.4% Above average	Read 88 Write 91.3 Mixed 93.3 SusWrite 115 72% 96.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.9 170% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 58.4% Great: 76%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CM4X8GF2400C16K4 2x8GB 3,467 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (19^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	65.4% Good	MC Read 26.3 MC Write 17.5 MC Mixed 25.8 66% 23.2 GB/s	SC Read 20.4 SC Write 17.5 SC Mixed 24 59% 20.6 GB/s	Latency 92.1 43% 92.1 ns
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 65.4% Great: 88%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 26: 0P 3R 2G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
26%	22%	45	192	12	144	27"	2560 1377	AOC2702 Q27G2G4

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Amd Am4 Gen3 Builds (Compare 415 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 101%

UFO

Desktop 103%

UFO

Workstation 92%

Nuclear submarine

System: Pcspecialist Amd Am4 Gen3

CPU
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $115Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	90x
Ryzen 9 5900XAMD $245Bench 99%, 60,132 samples	84x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $175Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	70x

GPU
RTX 3060Nvidia $283Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	53x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	52x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	48x

SSD
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $107Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	30x
670p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBIntel $80Bench 251%, 14,932 samples	28x
PCS PCIe M.2 SSD 1TB1TBBench 208%, 840 samples	26x

RAM
CMWX16GC3600C18W2D 2x16GBCorsairBench 102%, 1,308 samples	48x
CM4X8GD3200C16K4 2x8GBCorsairBench 89%, 9,947 samples	37x
CMWX8GD3600C18W2D 2x8GBCorsairBench 92%, 1,464 samples	32x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 104% - Outstanding

Total price: $505

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $23	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16