MSI MAG Z790 TOMAHAWK MAX WIFI (MS-7E25)

Performance Results


Gaming 45% Speed boat	Desktop 118% UFO	Workstation 55% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 126%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	29.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

System	Micro-Star MS-7E25
Motherboard	MSI MAG Z790 TOMAHAWK MAX WIFI (MS-7E25) (all builds)
Memory	50.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20240326
Uptime	0.8 Days
Run Date	Apr 26 '24 at 22:42
Run Duration	197 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-14700K-$389 5,171 User benchmarks, average bench 130% U3E1, 1 CPU, 20 cores, 28 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 5.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	126% Outstanding	Memory 78.9 1-Core 230 2-Core 459 131% 256 Pts	4-Core 918 8-Core 1,792 161% 1,355 Pts	64-Core 3846 238% 3846 Pts
Poor: 125% ↑ This bench: 126% Great: 134%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Asus(1043 862A) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 552.12 Performing below potential (59^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	29.3% Poor	Lighting 37.3 Reflection 40.8 Parallax 41.9 30% 40 fps	MRender 37.6 Gravity 38.1 Splatting 26.9 27% 34.2 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 29.3% Great: 33%
Intel UHD Graphics 770 8,462 User benchmarks, average bench 8% MSI(1462 7E25) 128MB Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.5445 Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	9.35% Terrible	Lighting 10.5 Reflection 16.2 Parallax 11.7 9% 12.8 fps	MRender 14.4 Gravity 14.8 Splatting 11.5 11% 13.6 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 9.35% Great: 10%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$80 202,785 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 268GB free Firmware: M3CR045 SusWrite @10s intervals: 293 301 299 302 302 302 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	87.8% Excellent	Read 301 Write 385 Mixed 323 SusWrite 300 74% 327 MB/s	4K Read 35.3 4K Write 73.9 4K Mixed 46.7 152% 52 MB/s	DQ Read 239 DQ Write 199 DQ Mixed 151 132% 197 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 87.8% Great: 125%
CT1000T500SSD8 1TB 778 User benchmarks, average bench 448% 158GB free (System drive) Firmware: P8CR002 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 4,010 Write 4,460 Mixed 2,574 821% 3,681 MB/s	4K Read 75.1 4K Write 224 4K Mixed 109 372% 136 MB/s	DQ Read 1,602 DQ Write 1,193 DQ Mixed 1,387 1,040% 1,394 MB/s
Poor: 220% Great: 658%
WD RE4 1TB (2010)-$54 23,775 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 166GB free Firmware: 01.01V02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 110 111 110 111 110 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	62.1% Good	Read 106 Write 106 Mixed 102 SusWrite 110 79% 106 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 0.7 161% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 62.1% Great: 76%
WD VelociRaptor 2.5" 1TB-$52 1,134 User benchmarks, average bench 100% 269GB free Firmware: 04.06A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 125 127 125 125 125 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	79.3% Very good	Read 150 Write 145 Mixed 90.6 SusWrite 126 94% 128 MB/s	4K Read 1.7 4K Write 3.6 4K Mixed 1.5 304% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 79.3% Great: 120%
WD WD1003FBYX-18Y7B0 2TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 782GB free Firmware: MK7OA840 SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 141 141 140 141 140 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples		Read 122 Write 137 Mixed 64.8 SusWrite 140 85% 116 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.8 165% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 86% Great: 86%
WD RE4 1TB (2010)-$54 23,775 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 389GB free Firmware: 01.01V02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 82 80 79 80 79 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	46.7% Average	Read 81.5 Write 84.5 Mixed 81.4 SusWrite 80.6 61% 82 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.8 169% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 46.7% Great: 76%
Samsung HD103SI 1TB-$89 48,059 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 261GB free Firmware: 1AG01118 SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 97 100 97 99 96 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	53.1% Above average	Read 87.2 Write 108 Mixed 55.9 SusWrite 97.8 64% 87.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 53.1% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G Skill Intl F5-6400J3239G322x31.5GB 6,603 User benchmarks, average bench 190% 2 of 4 slots used 63GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	164% Outstanding	MC Read 65.8 MC Write 64.9 MC Mixed 61.7 183% 64.1 GB/s	SC Read 18.9 SC Write 51.3 SC Mixed 29.7 95% 33.3 GB/s	Latency 87.9 46% 87.9 ns
Poor: 150% ↑ This bench: 164% Great: 218%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	56	31	75	23.8"	1280 720	ACR0521 R241Y

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MAG Z790 TOMAHAWK MAX WIFI (MS-7E25) Builds (Compare 473 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 456%

UFO

Desktop 126%

UFO

Workstation 574%

UFO

Motherboard: MSI MAG Z790 TOMAHAWK MAX WIFI (MS-7E25)

CPU
Core i7-14700KIntel $389Bench 130%, 5,171 samples	130x
Core i9-14900KIntel $499Bench 131%, 8,839 samples	119x
Core i9-14900KFIntel $522Bench 131%, 4,811 samples	41x

GPU
RTX 4090Nvidia $1,800Bench 370%, 25,956 samples	64x
RTX 4070-TiNvidia $750Bench 240%, 46,082 samples	39x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	36x

SSD
990 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $183Bench 460%, 45,230 samples	66x
Black SN850X NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBWD $140Bench 513%, 26,880 samples	33x
990 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $115Bench 421%, 18,218 samples	27x

RAM
Skill Intl F5-6400J3239G322x31.5GBGBench 190%, 6,603 samples	40x
CMH32GX5M2E6000C36 2x16GBCorsairBench 169%, 4,997 samples	23x
Skill Intl F5-6000J3636F162x16GBGBench 172%, 21,264 samples	21x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 70% - Very good

Total price: $2,372

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16