Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics25.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive59.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M5A99X EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory1.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130410
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateApr 26 '24 at 18:49
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
58.9% Above average
Memory 75.5
1-Core 66.5
2-Core 125
54% 88.9 Pts
4-Core 229
8-Core 337
35% 283 Pts
64-Core 371
23% 371 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6650-XT
XFX(1EAE 6502) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 24.2.1
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
25.5% Poor
Lighting 0.2
Reflection 134
Parallax 224
0% 119 fps
MRender 202
Gravity 114
Splatting 0.3
75% 106 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 25.5%
Great: 116%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS200T2B0A-00SM50 2TB
242GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 411040WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 208 176 181 187 136 176 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
59.6% Above average
Read 349
Write 339
Mixed 212
SusWrite 177
60% 269 MB/s
4K Read 24.1
4K Write 36.8
4K Mixed 18.7
80% 26.5 MB/s
DQ Read 280
DQ Write 206
DQ Mixed 125
125% 203 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 117%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$23
150GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 137 102 74 76 80 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
64.4% Good
Read 123
Write 109
Mixed 80.9
SusWrite 101
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
172% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 64.4%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Value DDR3 1333 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
35.2% Below average
MC Read 14.4
MC Write 12.8
MC Mixed 13.5
39% 13.6 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 9.3
22% 7.8 GB/s
Latency 316
13% 316 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 35.2%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 6: 0P 0R 0G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
6% 19% 32 199 56 60 72.3" 1280 720 TSB0206 TOSHIBA-TV
Typical M5A99X EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 754 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $729
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $23Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback