Asus TUF GAMING B450M-PLUS II

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 110%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Boot Drive394% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B450M-PLUS II  (all builds)
Memory13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240322
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 26 '24 at 17:48
Run Duration187 Seconds
Run User EGY-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X-$162
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Memory 93.2
1-Core 172
2-Core 340
108% 202 Pts
4-Core 678
8-Core 1,291
117% 984 Pts
64-Core 1,465
91% 1,465 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 110%
Great: 108%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lexar ARES 2TB
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 11296
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2641 2594 2573 2062 942 807 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
394% Outstanding
Read 2,805
Write 2,785
Mixed 2,474
SusWrite 1,937
562% 2,500 MB/s
4K Read 73.5
4K Write 186
4K Mixed 100
338% 120 MB/s
DQ Read 1,476
DQ Write 1,147
DQ Mixed 1,264
958% 1,296 MB/s
Poor: 256%
This bench: 394%
Great: 586%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
975GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 101 103 99 105 101 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
68.9% Good
Read 137
Write 189
Mixed 80.8
SusWrite 102
93% 127 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
288% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 68.9%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hewlett-Packard 7EH67AA# 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
91.1% Outstanding
MC Read 37.4
MC Write 24.1
MC Mixed 33.7
91% 31.7 GB/s
SC Read 31.5
SC Write 23.9
SC Mixed 37
88% 30.8 GB/s
Latency 61
66% 61 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 91.1%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 144 0" 1280 720
Typical TUF GAMING B450M-PLUS II Builds (Compare 1,546 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B450M-PLUS II

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Excellent Total price: $378
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback