Gigabyte GA-Z690 AORUS ULTRA

Performance Results


Gaming 489% UFO	Desktop 128% UFO	Workstation 565% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 131%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	392% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	352% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-Z690 AORUS ULTRA (all builds)
Memory	53.9 GB free of 64 GB
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20230309
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 26 '24 at 17:23
Run Duration	384 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-13900K-$471 49,132 User benchmarks, average bench 129% U3E1, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 32 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 5.1 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	131% Outstanding	Memory 90.8 1-Core 232 2-Core 464 135% 262 Pts	4-Core 920 8-Core 1,466 147% 1,193 Pts	64-Core 3288 204% 3288 Pts
Poor: 123% ↑ This bench: 131% Great: 135%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,800 25,956 User benchmarks, average bench 370% Gigabyte(1458 40BF) CLim: 3120 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 552.22 Performing below potential (77^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	392% Outstanding	Lighting 626 Reflection 584 Parallax 723 510% 644 fps	MRender 545 Gravity 585 Splatting 303 374% 478 fps
Poor: 303% ↑ This bench: 392% Great: 407%
Intel UHD Graphics 770 8,462 User benchmarks, average bench 8% Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4577 Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	8.25% Terrible	Lighting 11 Reflection 16.7 Parallax 12.8 9% 13.5 fps	MRender 14.8 Gravity 13.9 Splatting 0.1 7% 9.6 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 8.25% Great: 10%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$95 455,997 User benchmarks, average bench 310% 213GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1642 1352 1321 1229 1147 1089 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	352% Outstanding	Read 2649 Write 2,437 Mixed 1,854 SusWrite 1,297 461% 2,059 MB/s	4K Read 67 4K Write 183 4K Mixed 96.4 322% 115 MB/s	DQ Read 1,698 DQ Write 1,331 DQ Mixed 1,500 1,126% 1,510 MB/s
Poor: 188% ↑ This bench: 352% Great: 410%
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80 69,224 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 61GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 364 154 154 154 154 154 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	111% Outstanding	Read 499 Write 483 Mixed 405 SusWrite 189 88% 394 MB/s	4K Read 45.6 4K Write 123 4K Mixed 60.6 212% 76.4 MB/s	DQ Read 279 DQ Write 321 DQ Mixed 335 242% 312 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 111% Great: 115%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$85 58,572 User benchmarks, average bench 341% 391GB free Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 3299 3299 3298 1659 658 655 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	449% Outstanding	Read 3,024 Write 3,315 Mixed 3,016 SusWrite 2,145 648% 2,875 MB/s	4K Read 85.4 4K Write 226 4K Mixed 122 406% 145 MB/s	DQ Read 1,769 DQ Write 1,393 DQ Mixed 1,592 1,188% 1585 MB/s
Poor: 206% ↑ This bench: 449% Great: 442%
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$170 93,447 User benchmarks, average bench 322% 125GB free Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1818 1427 1280 1156 1052 948 MB/s Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	347% Outstanding	Read 2,676 Write 2,125 Mixed 1,546 SusWrite 1280 426% 1,907 MB/s	4K Read 62 4K Write 209 4K Mixed 87.5 317% 120 MB/s	DQ Read 1,476 DQ Write 1,417 DQ Mixed 1,552 1,136% 1,482 MB/s
Poor: 195% ↑ This bench: 347% Great: 393%
Seagate IronWolf 10TB (2016)-$233 347 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 6TB free Firmware: SC60 SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 185 186 187 187 186 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 34% Great: 113%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 211GB free Firmware: CC41 SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 160 160 160 160 158 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	86.1% Excellent	Read 141 Write 145 Mixed 73 SusWrite 159 95% 130 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 135% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 86.1% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMH64GX5M2B6000C30 2x31.5GB 625 User benchmarks, average bench 190% 2 of 4 slots used 63GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 6000 MHz Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	199% Outstanding	MC Read 80.7 MC Write 75.8 MC Mixed 77.1 222% 77.9 GB/s	SC Read 28.7 SC Write 52.9 SC Mixed 41.1 117% 40.9 GB/s	Latency 65.7 61% 65.7 ns
Poor: 139% ↑ This bench: 199% Great: 266%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	69	57	165	27"	1280 720	AOCA504 AG275QXN

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z690 AORUS ULTRA Builds (Compare 1,604 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 214%

UFO

Desktop 116%

UFO

Workstation 251%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z690 AORUS ULTRA

CPU
Core i9-12900KIntel $291Bench 117%, 66,991 samples	380x
Core i7-12700KIntel $238Bench 114%, 78,749 samples	299x
Core i7-12700KFIntel $190Bench 114%, 70,812 samples	173x

GPU
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	198x
RTX 3080-TiNvidia $660Bench 204%, 155,335 samples	198x
RTX 3070-TiNvidia $499Bench 158%, 218,061 samples	125x

SSD
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $107Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	218x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $169Bench 416%, 138,083 samples	188x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	58x

RAM
Vengeance LPX 5600 C36 2x16GBCorsairBench 162%, 23,486 samples	107x
Skill Intl F5-6000J3636F162x16GBGBench 172%, 21,264 samples	105x
Co Ltd GP-ARS32G52D5 2x16GBGIGA-BYTEBench 154%, 716 samples	89x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 71% - Very good

Total price: $1,308

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16