Intel X99-P4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 116%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics182% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive222% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemINTEL
MotherboardIntel X99-P4  (all builds)
Memory10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240106
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateApr 26 '24 at 15:41
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
73.9% Very good
Memory 88.9
1-Core 75.2
2-Core 163
65% 109 Pts
4-Core 318
8-Core 554
53% 436 Pts
64-Core 817
51% 817 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$550
Nvidia(10DE 1612) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
182% Outstanding
Lighting 253
Reflection 260
Parallax 295
206% 270 fps
MRender 326
Gravity 235
Splatting 176
193% 245 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 182%
Great: 202%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 1TB 1TB
892GB free (System drive)
Firmware: W0717A3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1407 1408 1423 1345 1431 1427 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
222% Outstanding
Read 1,594
Write 1,404
Mixed 1,039
SusWrite 1,407
306% 1,361 MB/s
4K Read 36.3
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 29.7
148% 56.8 MB/s
DQ Read 749
DQ Write 542
DQ Mixed 588
455% 626 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 222%
Great: 209%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA42GR7MFR4N-TF 1x16GB
1 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
34.2% Below average
MC Read 12.7
MC Write 10.7
MC Mixed 10.5
32% 11.3 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 10.5
SC Mixed 9
28% 9.7 GB/s
Latency 72.1
56% 72.1 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 34.2%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 48 12 60 27" 1280 720 SAM0D22 S27F350
Typical X99-P4 Builds (Compare 348 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Intel X99-P4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback