TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Lenovo 82UG

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics31.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive319% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 82UG  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory8.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220627
Uptime4.7 Days
Run DateApr 26 '24 at 13:38
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H
FP7, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
96.2% Outstanding
Memory 76.3
1-Core 166
2-Core 327
100% 190 Pts
4-Core 621
8-Core 1089
103% 855 Pts
64-Core 1,303
81% 1,303 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑
This bench: 96.2%
 Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Legend(17AA 3B28) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.20.46.21
Performing below potential (77th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
31.9% Below average
Lighting 37.7
Reflection 48
Parallax 69.9
31% 51.9 fps
MRender 25
Gravity 42.2
Splatting 52.8
34% 40 fps
Poor: 15% ↑
This bench: 31.9%
 Great: 35%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL21T0HCLR-00BL2 1TB
700GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CL1QGXA7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1751 1672 1820 2199 2208 1783 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
319% Outstanding
Read 2,234
Write 2,165
Mixed 2,152
SusWrite 1,905
476% 2,114 MB/s
4K Read 60
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 76.9
253% 85.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1055
DQ Write 478
DQ Mixed 1,128
741% 887 MB/s
Poor: 201% ↑
This bench: 319%
 Great: 458%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M425R1GB4BB0-CQKOD M425R1GB4BB0-CQKOD 16GB
4800, 4800 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
112% Outstanding
MC Read 40.5
MC Write 43.7
MC Mixed 37.8
116% 40.7 GB/s
SC Read 25.9
SC Write 49.7
SC Mixed 29.1
100% 34.9 GB/s
Latency 87.4
46% 87.4 ns
Poor: 81% ↑
This bench: 112%
 Great: 136%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 165 16" 1707 996 BOE0A9B
Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical 82UG Builds (Compare 37 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

System: Lenovo 82UG

CPU
Ryzen 9 6900HXAMDBench 80%, 2,058 samples20x
Ryzen 7 6800HAMDBench 78%, 6,532 samples17x
GPU
Radeon GraphicsAMDBench 27%, 25,679 samples18x
RX 6800S (Laptop)AMDBench 92%, 499 samples15x
Radeon RX 6600SAMDBench 74%, 25 samples4x
SSD
MZVL21T0HCLR-00BL2 1TBSamsungBench 363%, 10,270 samples15x
SKHynix_HFS001TEJ9X115N 1TBBench 439%, 1,257 samples5x
SKHynix_HFS512GEJ9X115N 512GBBench 342%, 1,595 samples5x
RAM
M425R1GB4BB0-CQKOL M425R1GB4BB0-CQKOD 16GBSamsungBench 119%, 1,385 samples18x
MTC4C10163S1SC48BA1 Samsung M425R1GB4BB0-CQKOD 16GBMicronBench 121%, 503 samples6x
HMCG66MEBSA092N Samsung M425R1GB4BB0-CQKOD 16GBHynixBench 116%, 75 samples5x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback