TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

HP Victus by HP Gaming Laptop 15-fa1xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics9.97% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive76.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP Victus by HP Gaming Laptop 15-fa1xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8BB2
Memory21.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230726
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 26 '24 at 07:25
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-13420H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
53% Above average
Memory 36.6
1-Core 76.1
2-Core 199
52% 104 Pts
4-Core 434
8-Core 221
49% 327 Pts
64-Core 222
14% 222 Pts
Poor: 90% ↑
This bench: 53%
 Great: 103%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
HP(103C 8BB2) 128MB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.5186
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
9.97% Terrible
Lighting 12.5
Reflection 16.7
Parallax 13.4
10% 14.2 fps
MRender 0.2
Gravity 17.7
Splatting 14.9
10% 10.9 fps
Poor: 9% ↑
This bench: 9.97%
 Great: 16%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hs-ssd-desire(p) 1024G 1TB
425GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 400fAA13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 88 82 17 3.2 175 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
76.2% Very good
Read 801
Write 312
Mixed 144
SusWrite 77.5
72% 334 MB/s
4K Read 21.4
4K Write 44.7
4K Mixed 28
92% 31.4 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 91.3
DQ Mixed 126
122% 202 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑
This bench: 76.2%
 Great: 304%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT32G4SFD832A.C16FF 1x31GB
1 of 2 slots used
31GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
42% Average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 15.3
MC Mixed 16.1
46% 15.9 GB/s
SC Read 6.5
SC Write 12.5
SC Mixed 8.9
27% 9.3 GB/s
Latency 181
22% 181 ns
Poor: 29% ↑
This bench: 42%
 Great: 57%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 30 12 144 15.5" 1280 720 BOE094D
Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Victus by HP Gaming Laptop 15-fa1xxx Builds (Compare 842 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard

System: HP Victus by HP Gaming Laptop 15-fa1xxx

CPU
Core i5-12500HIntelBench 94%, 11,588 samples242x
Core i7-13700HIntelBench 104%, 4,359 samples200x
Core i5-13420HIntelBench 98%, 902 samples192x
GPU
Iris Xe GraphicsIntelBench 19%, 14,602 samples182x
RTX 4050 (Laptop)NvidiaBench 96%, 5,690 samples168x
Iris Xe GraphicsIntelBench 16%, 72,765 samples130x
SSD
KIOXIA 512GBKxg80znv512gBench 231%, 1,086 samples174x
MZVL2512HCJQ-00BH1 512GBSamsungBench 250%, 5,777 samples117x
MZVL2512HDJD-00BH1 512GBSamsungBench 262%, 430 samples102x
RAM
HMAA1GS6CJR6N-XN 2x8GBHynixBench 66%, 21,689 samples144x
M471A1K43EB1-CWE 2x8GBSamsungBench 86%, 38,732 samples115x
4ATF1G64HZ-3G2F1 2x8GBMicronBench 66%, 1,418 samples109x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback