TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop K5504VA_S5504VA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics17.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive216% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop K5504VA_S5504VA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK K5504VA
Memory5.6 GB free of 16 GB
Display2880 x 1620 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231003
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateApr 26 '24 at 04:56
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-13500H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
72.1% Very good
Memory 45.1
1-Core 115
2-Core 261
71% 140 Pts
4-Core 530
8-Core 804
83% 667 Pts
64-Core 1,188
74% 1,188 Pts
Poor: 96% ↑
This bench: 72.1%
 Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Asus(1043 1703) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4255
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
17.7% Very poor
Lighting 21.4
Reflection 25.7
Parallax 24.3
17% 23.8 fps
MRender 22.2
Gravity 28.6
Splatting 17.6
18% 22.8 fps
Poor: 13% ↑
This bench: 17.7%
 Great: 23%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Micron_2400_MTFDKBA512QFM 512GB
323GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V3MA003 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1378 161 826 1557 1259 91 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
216% Outstanding
Read 1,335
Write 1471
Mixed 1,231
SusWrite 879
277% 1,229 MB/s
4K Read 44.8
4K Write 229
4K Mixed 29.5
227% 101 MB/s
DQ Read 1,002
DQ Write 966
DQ Mixed 879
689% 949 MB/s
Poor: 107% ↑
This bench: 216%
 Great: 234%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8x2GB
8 of 8 slots used
16GB Row of chips 23h 6400 MHz clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (48th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
119% Outstanding
MC Read 45.5
MC Write 53.9
MC Mixed 45.8
138% 48.4 GB/s
SC Read 10.2
SC Write 23.6
SC Mixed 15.5
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 167
24% 167 ns
Poor: 80% ↑
This bench: 119%
 Great: 141%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 21 1 120 15.5" 1280 720 SDC4180
Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Vivobook_ASUSLaptop K5504VA_S5504VA Builds (Compare 14 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

System: Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop K5504VA_S5504VA

CPU
Core i5-13500HIntelBench 100%, 1,437 samples9x
Core i9-13900HIntelBench 107%, 5,250 samples5x
GPU
Iris Xe GraphicsIntelBench 19%, 14,602 samples14x
SSD
Micron_2400_MTFDKBA512QFM 512GBNvmeBench 172%, 2,910 samples5x
SAMSUNG MZVL4512HBLU-00BTW 512GBNvmeBench 242%, 600 samples4x
Micron_2450_MTFDKBA1T0TFK 1TBNvmeBench 243%, 3,424 samples3x
RAM
H9JCNNNCP3MLYR-N6E 8x2GBHynixBench 118%, 2,587 samples8x
8x2GBMicronBench 117%, 968 samples6x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback