Asrock B450M Pro4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 92%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 84%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics105% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive92.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
1 month ago, 1 month ago.
MotherboardAsrock B450M Pro4  (all builds)
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221020
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 26 '24 at 02:28
Run Duration245 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$145
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
82.4% Excellent
Memory 83.6
1-Core 120
2-Core 234
82% 146 Pts
4-Core 437
8-Core 705
70% 571 Pts
64-Core 916
57% 916 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 82.4%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$510
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Lighting 130
Reflection 115
Parallax 146
106% 130 fps
MRender 183
Gravity 116
Splatting 106
107% 135 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 105%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Aego 120GB 120GB
49GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0526A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 259 176 139 139 139 139 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
92.5% Outstanding
Read 507
Write 416
Mixed 413
SusWrite 165
84% 375 MB/s
4K Read 32.6
4K Write 86.7
4K Mixed 45.2
153% 54.8 MB/s
DQ Read 331
DQ Write 320
DQ Mixed 99.9
137% 250 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 92.5%
Great: 111%
Aego 480GB 480GB
426GB free
Firmware: Q0526A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 448 449 446 452 452 451 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 508
Write 474
Mixed 440
SusWrite 450
105% 468 MB/s
4K Read 35.1
4K Write 90.5
4K Mixed 50
165% 58.5 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 360
DQ Mixed 120
160% 289 MB/s
Poor: 86%
This bench: 116%
Great: 124%
Fanxiang S500PRO 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: SN10613
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2071 2078 2069 2062 2002 2062 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
305% Outstanding
Read 1,787
Write 2,266
Mixed 1,874
SusWrite 2,057
452% 1,996 MB/s
4K Read 54.5
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 70.1
231% 78.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1004
DQ Write 602
DQ Mixed 668
534% 758 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 305%
Great: 368%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
869GB free
Firmware: MS2OA7S0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 191 185 179 174 163 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 183
Write 148
Mixed 35.6
SusWrite 178
98% 136 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
139% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 104%
Great: 107%
Seagate Portable 1TB
503GB free
Firmware: 9300
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 129 121 120 122 128 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
56.6% Above average
Read 74.2
Write 72.4
Mixed 32.6
SusWrite 122
55% 75.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.4
153% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CL18-20-20 D4-3600 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
108% Outstanding
MC Read 43.5
MC Write 40.5
MC Mixed 34.7
113% 39.6 GB/s
SC Read 27.7
SC Write 37.4
SC Mixed 29.2
90% 31.4 GB/s
Latency 73.2
55% 73.2 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 108%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 55 60 23" 1280 720 HWP288F HP 2310e
Typical B450M Pro4 Builds (Compare 9,041 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asrock B450M Pro4 - $79

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $422
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback