Asus Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 107%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 139%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics121% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive118% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI  (all builds)
Memory121.3 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210317
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateApr 25 '24 at 21:00
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX 16-Cores
SP3, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
86.4% Excellent
Memory 71
1-Core 146
2-Core 289
90% 169 Pts
4-Core 545
8-Core 1,038
94% 791 Pts
64-Core 2,927
181% 2,927 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 86.4%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6700-XT-$480
PowerColor(148C 2410) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 12GB, Driver: 24.3.1
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
121% Outstanding
Lighting 133
Reflection 133
Parallax 279
109% 182 fps
MRender 241
Gravity 145
Splatting 198
159% 195 fps
Poor: 113%
This bench: 121%
Great: 129%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 1TB
821GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT24B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 486 486 486 468 476 477 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 516
Write 482
Mixed 465
SusWrite 480
110% 486 MB/s
4K Read 42.9
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 44.8
183% 67.4 MB/s
DQ Read 268
DQ Write 279
DQ Mixed 289
213% 279 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 118%
Great: 133%
Kingston SKC6001024G 1TB
378GB free
Firmware: S4500105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 441 441 440 442 441 442 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 504
Write 435
Mixed 400
SusWrite 441
100% 445 MB/s
4K Read 43.2
4K Write 91.4
4K Mixed 57.6
188% 64.1 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 182
142% 196 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 115%
Great: 131%
Kingston SKC6001024G 1TB
453GB free
Firmware: S4500105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 364 365 363 365 365 365 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 373
Write 363
Mixed 329
SusWrite 364
81% 357 MB/s
4K Read 40.2
4K Write 81.9
4K Mixed 52.4
171% 58.2 MB/s
DQ Read 240
DQ Write 188
DQ Mixed 198
152% 208 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 100%
Great: 131%
Kingston SKC6001024G 1TB
954GB free
Firmware: S4500105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 442 440 442 441 442 441 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 504
Write 428
Mixed 399
SusWrite 441
100% 443 MB/s
4K Read 43.3
4K Write 92.6
4K Mixed 57.5
188% 64.5 MB/s
DQ Read 221
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 180
141% 195 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 115%
Great: 131%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$48
1TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 195 191 190 195 196 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
69.1% Good
Read 48.2
Write 92.1
Mixed 78
SusWrite 192
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 3
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
147% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3600C18D4/32GX 4x31.8GB
4 of 8 slots used
127GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
109% Outstanding
MC Read 41.5
MC Write 42
MC Mixed 40.3
118% 41.3 GB/s
SC Read 20.5
SC Write 24.1
SC Mixed 34.6
76% 26.4 GB/s
Latency 99.8
40% 99.8 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 109%
Great: 142%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 144 23.8" 1280 720 AUS2421 ASUS VG249
Typical Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI Builds (Compare 333 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 182%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 319%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $1,353
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback