Bosgame H68

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics27.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive220% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemBosgame H68  (all builds)
MotherboardBosgame Bosgame
Memory8.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230922
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 25 '24 at 18:45
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H
FP7, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
92.3% Outstanding
Memory 75.8
1-Core 166
2-Core 302
97% 181 Pts
4-Core 581
8-Core 1,133
102% 857 Pts
64-Core 1,248
77% 1,248 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 92.3%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
AMD(1002 0124) 3GB
Ram: 3GB, Driver: 22.11.2
Performing below potential (44th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
27.7% Poor
Lighting 37.5
Reflection 41.2
Parallax 64.2
31% 47.6 fps
MRender 25.9
Gravity 23.7
Splatting 30.6
22% 26.7 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 27.7%
Great: 35%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston OM8SEP4512N-A0 512GB
441GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBM01100
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1233 1254 1249 1043 307 304 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
220% Outstanding
Read 2,005
Write 1,265
Mixed 1,229
SusWrite 898
300% 1,349 MB/s
4K Read 44.4
4K Write 148
4K Mixed 41.3
199% 78 MB/s
DQ Read 397
DQ Write 771
DQ Mixed 443
377% 537 MB/s
Poor: 131%
This bench: 220%
Great: 247%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G48C40S5.M4A1 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
117% Outstanding
MC Read 41.8
MC Write 48.3
MC Mixed 38.9
123% 43 GB/s
SC Read 26.8
SC Write 50
SC Mixed 30
102% 35.6 GB/s
Latency 87
46% 87 ns
Poor: 90%
This bench: 117%
Great: 138%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 55 60 31.5" 1280 720 INS3283 NS32DF310NA19
Typical H68 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

System: Bosgame H68

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback