MSI MS-1772

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.31% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive62% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
1 month ago, 1 month ago.
SystemMicro-Star GS70 2PC Stealth
MotherboardMSI MS-1772  (all builds)
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140514
Uptime10.8 Days
Run DateApr 25 '24 at 18:07
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4710HQ
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
69.3% Good
Memory 80.4
1-Core 89.4
2-Core 182
68% 117 Pts
4-Core 315
8-Core 488
50% 401 Pts
64-Core 488
30% 488 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
MSI(1462 1104) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4624
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
3.31% Terrible
Lighting 3.6
Reflection 2.7
Parallax 6.5
3% 4.27 fps
MRender 7.7
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 4.9
4% 5 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.31%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM851 mSATA 256GB
190GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT4AD0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 207 174 92 72 77 63 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
62% Good
Read 430
Write 188
Mixed 136
SusWrite 114
48% 217 MB/s
4K Read 21.9
4K Write 50.7
4K Mixed 22.2
88% 31.6 MB/s
DQ Read 367
DQ Write 124
DQ Mixed 75.9
100% 189 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 62%
Great: 83%
HGST Travelstar 5K1000 2.5" 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: JA0OA560
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 98 99 98 99 99 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
54.7% Above average
Read 92
Write 93.4
Mixed 37.7
SusWrite 98.6
58% 80.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
100% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AM1L16BC8R2-B1QS 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
51.4% Above average
MC Read 19.2
MC Write 18.9
MC Mixed 15
51% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 17.6
SC Mixed 17.1
47% 16.5 GB/s
Latency 82.2
49% 82.2 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 2: 0P 0R 0G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
2% 5% 42 153 9 60 17.3" 1920 1080 CMO1720
Typical MS-1772 Builds (Compare 156 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-1772

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback