Oegstone MS-7817

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive50.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemOegstone MS-7817  (all builds)
MotherboardMSI H81M-P33 (MS-7817)
Memory10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20140126
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 25 '24 at 11:31
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User PAK-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
82.6% Excellent
Memory 92
1-Core 119
2-Core 227
83% 146 Pts
4-Core 394
8-Core 616
62% 505 Pts
64-Core 611
38% 611 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 82.6%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD GREEN 256GB SSD
53GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V1031C0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.6 105 4.9 19 93 8.3 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
50.4% Above average
Read 495
Write 322
Mixed 378
SusWrite 39
68% 309 MB/s
4K Read 28.9
4K Write 80.2
4K Mixed 6.4
94% 38.5 MB/s
DQ Read 84.9
DQ Write 7.4
DQ Mixed 0.4
12% 30.9 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 66%
Hitachi HDS723015BLA642 1.5TB
12GB free
Firmware: MN5OA5Q0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 39 47 46 40 47 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
36.4% Below average
Read 83.2
Write 90.4
Mixed 51.8
SusWrite 43.4
50% 67.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
105% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GU6MFR8C-PB HMT41GU6BFR8C-PB 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
57.5% Above average
MC Read 21
MC Write 21
MC Mixed 16.6
56% 19.5 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 21.3
SC Mixed 19.1
53% 18.5 GB/s
Latency 63.8
63% 63.8 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 43 9 60 0" 1280 720
Typical MS-7817 Builds (Compare 164 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Oegstone MS-7817

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $114
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback