Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A16 FA617NT_FA617NT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 119%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics113% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive367% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Gaming A16 FA617NT_FA617NT  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FA617NT
Memory9 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230927
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateApr 24 '24 at 22:38
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
FP7, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
98% Outstanding
Memory 75.2
1-Core 174
2-Core 342
103% 197 Pts
4-Core 645
8-Core 1,248
112% 947 Pts
64-Core 1,524
94% 1,524 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 98%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 7700S
Asus(1043 1513) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.40.03.05
Performing below potential (56th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
113% Outstanding
Lighting 128
Reflection 150
Parallax 222
105% 167 fps
MRender 163
Gravity 147
Splatting 187
138% 166 fps
Poor: 91%
This bench: 113%
Great: 122%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-512G-1002 512GB
421GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 73101000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2315 2340 2367 2447 2438 2368 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
367% Outstanding
Read 3,095
Write 2,478
Mixed 2,134
SusWrite 2,379
566% 2,521 MB/s
4K Read 54.4
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 61.9
221% 75.9 MB/s
DQ Read 998
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 832
572% 724 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 367%
Great: 465%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M425R1GB4BB0-CQKOL 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
119% Outstanding
MC Read 42.2
MC Write 49.2
MC Mixed 39.3
124% 43.6 GB/s
SC Read 28.5
SC Write 50.7
SC Mixed 31.2
105% 36.8 GB/s
Latency 90.8
44% 90.8 ns
Poor: 101%
This bench: 119%
Great: 136%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 165 16" 1280 720 BOE0B33 NE160WUM-NX2
Typical ASUS TUF Gaming A16 FA617NT_FA617NT Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 92%
Nuclear submarine

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A16 FA617NT_FA617NT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback