MSI PRO H610M-E DDR4 (MS-7D48)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 119%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 112%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics119% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive60.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7D48
MotherboardMSI PRO H610M-E DDR4 (MS-7D48)  (all builds)
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230526
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 24 '24 at 16:38
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User SAU-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12400F-$110
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
99.3% Outstanding
Memory 74.2
1-Core 167
2-Core 336
101% 192 Pts
4-Core 666
8-Core 999
104% 833 Pts
64-Core 1,200
74% 1,200 Pts
Poor: 92%
This bench: 99.3%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060-$293
Palit(1569 F311) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4250 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 536.40
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
119% Outstanding
Lighting 160
Reflection 111
Parallax 145
130% 139 fps
MRender 197
Gravity 127
Splatting 104
112% 143 fps
Poor: 115%
This bench: 119%
Great: 127%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Addlink SATA SSD 1TB
837GB free (System drive)
Firmware: W0724A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 176 104 60 221 64 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
60.9% Good
Read 508
Write 435
Mixed 414
SusWrite 114
82% 368 MB/s
4K Read 32.2
4K Write 58
4K Mixed 16.5
101% 35.6 MB/s
DQ Read 136
DQ Write 58.2
DQ Mixed 18.2
34% 70.9 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 111%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown AG8GB32C16X4UB 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
87.2% Excellent
MC Read 32.8
MC Write 32.3
MC Mixed 29.6
90% 31.6 GB/s
SC Read 21.6
SC Write 33
SC Mixed 25.6
76% 26.7 GB/s
Latency 90.5
44% 90.5 ns
Poor: 76%
This bench: 87.2%
Great: 100%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 58 180 27" 1280 720 ACR0BED VG270 M3
Typical PRO H610M-E DDR4 (MS-7D48) Builds (Compare 2,000 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 95%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: MSI PRO H610M-E DDR4 (MS-7D48)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $376
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback