Lenovo 12JF002UAU

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 115%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics8.38% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 12JF002UAU  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 3339
Memory9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230704
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateApr 24 '24 at 12:34
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-13700-$259
U3E1, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Memory 70.3
1-Core 212
2-Core 425
120% 236 Pts
4-Core 854
8-Core 1,598
146% 1,226 Pts
64-Core 2,625
162% 2,625 Pts
Poor: 116%
This bench: 115%
Great: 126%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 770
Legend(17AA 3339) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4255
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
8.38% Terrible
Lighting 9.4
Reflection 14.5
Parallax 10.6
8% 11.5 fps
MRender 13
Gravity 12.5
Splatting 10.8
10% 12.1 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 8.38%
Great: 10%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL41T0HBLB-00BL7 1TB
894GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CL2QHXC7
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,089
Write 1,971
Mixed 1,900
444% 1,986 MB/s
4K Read 56.5
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 75.3
244% 83.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1599
DQ Write 1,206
DQ Mixed 1,390
1,042% 1398 MB/s
Poor: 148% Great: 352%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A2G43BB3-CWE 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
47% Average
MC Read 16.8
MC Write 17.7
MC Mixed 14.7
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.8
SC Write 18.6
SC Mixed 13.9
42% 14.8 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 47%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 21.5" 1280 720 BNQ78E8 BenQ GW2280
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $139Nvidia RTX 4070 $515Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback