Asrock X670E Taichi Carrara

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 125%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Boot Drive522% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
1 month ago, 1 month ago.
SystemAsrock X670E Taichi Carrara  (all builds)
MotherboardASRock X670E Taichi Carrara
Memory56.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20240301
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 24 '24 at 12:14
Run Duration283 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D-$349
AM5, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 4.4 GHz, turbo 5.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
125% Outstanding
Memory 92.4
1-Core 212
2-Core 426
127% 243 Pts
4-Core 844
8-Core 1,620
146% 1,232 Pts
64-Core 2,865
177% 2,865 Pts
Poor: 109%
This bench: 125%
Great: 124%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,198
EVGA(3842 3998) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2250 MHz, MLim: 5375 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 552.12
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 326
Reflection 219
Parallax 317
266% 288 fps
Gravity 254
Splatting 182
188% 218 fps
Poor: 185% Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
T-force TM8FF1001T 1TB
810GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EQFM22.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5347 5088 1242 1259 1144 1154 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
522% Outstanding
Read 5,648
Write 5,636
Mixed 3,173
SusWrite 2,539
951% 4,249 MB/s
4K Read 61.9
4K Write 130
4K Mixed 84.1
270% 92 MB/s
DQ Read 1834
DQ Write 725
DQ Mixed 1,596
1,098% 1,385 MB/s
Poor: 330%
This bench: 522%
Great: 726%
Team T2534TB 4TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: VE0R840N
SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 177 198 263 270 282 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
71.1% Very good
Read 369
Write 373
Mixed 337
SusWrite 228
74% 327 MB/s
4K Read 20
4K Write 78.7
4K Mixed 30.2
111% 43 MB/s
DQ Read 109
DQ Write 262
DQ Mixed 169
134% 180 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 121%
T-force TM8FPZ004T 4TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: EIFM51.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 78 78 77 77 77 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
900% Outstanding
Read 13030
Write 52.9
Mixed 110
SusWrite 77.6
688% 3,318 MB/s
4K Read 924
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 9.4
1,414% 312 MB/s
Poor: 280%
This bench: 900%
Great: 595%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$155
2TB free
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2781 2809 2813 2817 2811 2822 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
424% Outstanding
Read 2,596
Write 2,868
Mixed 2,695
SusWrite 2,809
620% 2,742 MB/s
4K Read 58.2
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 73.3
236% 78 MB/s
DQ Read 1,922
DQ Write 1,477
DQ Mixed 1,687
1,265% 1,695 MB/s
Poor: 283%
This bench: 424%
Great: 526%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F5-6000J3040G32G 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
304% Outstanding
MC Read 189
MC Write 76.5
MC Mixed 91.3
340% 119 GB/s
SC Read 54.3
SC Write 78.3
SC Mixed 67.6
191% 66.7 GB/s
Latency 64.9
62% 64.9 ns
Poor: 152%
This bench: 304%
Great: 285%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 40 17 240 31.5" 1280 720 SAM7058 LC32G7xT
Typical X670E Taichi Carrara Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 402%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 115%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 528%
UFO

System: Asrock X670E Taichi Carrara

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $2,387
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback