Monster TULPAR T7 V20.5

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
1 month ago, 1 month ago.
SystemMonster TULPAR T7 V20.5  (all builds)
MotherboardMONSTER TULPAR T7 V20.5
Memory22.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220824
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateApr 24 '24 at 11:27
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
87.3% Excellent
Memory 69.4
1-Core 181
2-Core 344
103% 198 Pts
4-Core 563
8-Core 915
90% 739 Pts
64-Core 1,356
84% 1,356 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 87.3%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060 (Laptop)
Device(1D05 1174) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Lighting 132
Reflection 177
Parallax 124
108% 144 fps
MRender 146
Gravity 101
Splatting 87.9
88% 112 fps
Poor: 67%
This bench: 101%
Great: 105%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P5 Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$190
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: P7CR403 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,943
Write 3,650
Mixed 2,675
761% 3,423 MB/s
4K Read 53.5
4K Write 155
4K Mixed 52.8
231% 87.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1161
DQ Write 704
DQ Mixed 969
712% 945 MB/s
Poor: 261% Great: 564%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT32G4SFD832A.C16FF 1x31GB
1 of 2 slots used
31GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
52.2% Above average
MC Read 18.9
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 17.4
52% 18.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 19.3
SC Mixed 17.9
50% 17.6 GB/s
Latency 104
39% 104 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 40 5 180 27" 1280 720 MSI6CC2 G274F
Typical TULPAR T7 V20.5 Builds (Compare 361 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 91%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 95%
Nuclear submarine

System: Monster TULPAR T7 V20.5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback