Gigabyte GA-B660 DS3H AX DDR4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 117%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics273% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B660 DS3H AX DDR4  (all builds)
Memory8.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231215
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 24 '24 at 10:26
Run Duration81 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-13600KF-$235
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Memory 81
1-Core 213
2-Core 426
124% 240 Pts
4-Core 820
8-Core 1,465
138% 1,142 Pts
64-Core 2,411
149% 2,411 Pts
Poor: 117%
This bench: 117%
Great: 127%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 7900-XTX-$1,000
AMD(1002 0E3B) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 24GB, Driver: 24.3.1
Performing below potential (70th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
273% Outstanding
Lighting 373
Reflection 438
Parallax 773
304% 528 fps
MRender 479
Gravity 302
Splatting 454
340% 412 fps
Poor: 216%
This bench: 273%
Great: 293%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN850X NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$85
11GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 620311WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 4,404
Write 4,560
Mixed 3,128
898% 4,031 MB/s
4K Read 80
4K Write 322
4K Mixed 110
432% 170 MB/s
DQ Read 2,154
DQ Write 1,811
DQ Mixed 1,954
1,472% 1,973 MB/s
Poor: 251% Great: 598%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4DFD824A.M16FB 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
42.5% Average
MC Read 14.1
MC Write 14.8
MC Mixed 14.2
41% 14.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 15.3
SC Mixed 11.8
40% 14.1 GB/s
Latency 88
45% 88 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 42.5%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 55 144 27.9" 1280 720 ACR0907 XV282K KV
Typical GA-B660 DS3H AX DDR4 Builds (Compare 781 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 127%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 120%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B660 DS3H AX DDR4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $548
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback