Mousecomputer Z590-S01

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 125%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 108%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 128%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 107%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics114% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive192% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMousecomputer Z590-S01  (all builds)
MotherboardMouseComputer Z590-S01
Memory25.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210416
Uptime6.5 Days
Run DateApr 24 '24 at 05:57
Run Duration212 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-11900K-$254
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Memory 84.3
1-Core 179
2-Core 358
109% 207 Pts
4-Core 696
8-Core 1,243
117% 969 Pts
64-Core 1,724
107% 1,724 Pts
Poor: 94%
This bench: 107%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,198
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 537.13
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (144 fps cap detected)
114% Outstanding
Lighting 144
Reflection 144
Parallax 144
117% 144 fps
MRender 144
Gravity 144
Splatting 144
118% 144 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 114%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$70
186GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 004C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 220 447 104 169 25 13 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
192% Outstanding
Read 1,522
Write 1,576
Mixed 1,048
SusWrite 163
240% 1,077 MB/s
4K Read 59.7
4K Write 165
4K Mixed 81.8
282% 102 MB/s
DQ Read 636
DQ Write 869
DQ Mixed 468
433% 658 MB/s
Poor: 127%
This bench: 192%
Great: 255%
Fanxiang S101 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: VE1R900B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 402 400 400 403 402 402 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
91.4% Outstanding
Read 406
Write 400
Mixed 357
SusWrite 402
88% 391 MB/s
4K Read 23.6
4K Write 94.7
4K Mixed 37
133% 51.8 MB/s
DQ Read 149
DQ Write 276
DQ Mixed 191
151% 205 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 91.4%
Great: 92%
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$70
726GB free
Firmware: 004C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1319 1316 1323 1317 1325 1321 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
246% Outstanding
Read 1,521
Write 1,457
Mixed 1,058
SusWrite 1,320
301% 1,339 MB/s
4K Read 53.7
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 67.1
226% 77.3 MB/s
DQ Read 634
DQ Write 891
DQ Mixed 467
436% 664 MB/s
Poor: 127%
This bench: 246%
Great: 255%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston CBD32D4U2S8ME-16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
98.2% Outstanding
MC Read 40.4
MC Write 38.5
MC Mixed 26.1
100% 35 GB/s
SC Read 24
SC Write 41.8
SC Mixed 29.8
91% 31.9 GB/s
Latency 71.8
56% 71.8 ns
Poor: 84%
This bench: 98.2%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 55: 0P 5R 9G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
39% 21% 71 99 58 144 27" 1280 720 IOD43B1 EX-LDGC272HD
History: Score 39: 0P 3R 6G 6B | Score 55: 0P 5R 9G 3B
Typical Z590-S01 Builds (Compare 14 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat

System: Mousecomputer Z590-S01

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $336
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback