Asrock B550M Pro SE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 92%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 86%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (91st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 9 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics91.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive503% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
1 month ago, 1 month ago.
MotherboardAsrock B550M Pro SE  (all builds)
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230927
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 24 '24 at 03:46
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT-$359
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
95.8% Outstanding
Memory 86.9
1-Core 144
2-Core 295
95% 175 Pts
4-Core 562
8-Core 895
90% 729 Pts
64-Core 1,135
70% 1,135 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 95.8%
Great: 95%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6600-$330
ASRock(1849 5217) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.10.2
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
91.7% Outstanding
Lighting 91
Reflection 140
Parallax 174
74% 135 fps
MRender 206
Gravity 92.7
Splatting 162
126% 154 fps
Poor: 83%
This bench: 91.7%
Great: 91%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HP FX900 1TB
921GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.A.4.C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4465 4462 4489 4360 4488 4495 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
503% Outstanding
Read 2,654
Write 4,510
Mixed 2,833
SusWrite 4460
822% 3,614 MB/s
4K Read 76.7
4K Write 192
4K Mixed 58.4
293% 109 MB/s
DQ Read 766
DQ Write 927
DQ Mixed 163
313% 618 MB/s
Poor: 226%
This bench: 503%
Great: 509%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown D4U0832160B 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
87.9% Excellent
MC Read 35.2
MC Write 23.9
MC Mixed 34.5
89% 31.2 GB/s
SC Read 26.9
SC Write 23.4
SC Mixed 33.5
80% 27.9 GB/s
Latency 70.1
57% 70.1 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 87.9%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 64 47 60 27" 1280 720 ACR072C KA272
Typical B550M Pro SE Builds (Compare 109 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 100%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asrock B550M Pro SE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $386
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback