TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Lenovo 30GUS3FP00

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 111%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics9.31% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 30GUS3FP00  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 1064
Memory55.2 GB free of 64 GB
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240311
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 24 '24 at 01:48
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-13900K-$461
U3E1, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
111% Outstanding
Memory 72.8
1-Core 220
2-Core 441
124% 245 Pts
4-Core 801
8-Core 1,267
127% 1,034 Pts
64-Core 3,702
229% 3,702 Pts
Poor: 123% ↑
This bench: 111%
 Great: 135%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 770
Legend(17AA 1064) 128MB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.5187
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
9.31% Terrible
Lighting 10.5
Reflection 15.9
Parallax 11.5
9% 12.6 fps
MRender 14
Gravity 14.6
Splatting 11.5
11% 13.4 fps
Poor: 7% ↑
This bench: 9.31%
 Great: 10%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL21T0HDLU-00BLL 1TB
803GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 6L2QGXD7
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,716
Write 2,919
Mixed 2,498
606% 2,711 MB/s
4K Read 73
4K Write 204
4K Mixed 105
353% 127 MB/s
DQ Read 1,758
DQ Write 1319
DQ Mixed 1,519
1,141% 1,532 MB/s
Poor: 138% Great: 436%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMCG88AGBUA084N 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h 5600 MHz clocked @ 4400 MHz
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
141% Outstanding
MC Read 55.6
MC Write 54
MC Mixed 54
156% 54.5 GB/s
SC Read 19
SC Write 45.3
SC Mixed 28.6
88% 31 GB/s
Latency 96.3
42% 96.3 ns
Poor: 120% ↑
This bench: 141%
 Great: 156%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 60 27" 1280 720 LEN63A9 T27p-30
Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback