MSI X470 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B79)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B79
MotherboardMSI X470 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B79)  (all builds)
Memory22.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220727
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateApr 23 '24 at 21:27
Run Duration320 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 23%
Watch Gameplay: 2060S + 5800X How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X-$360
AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Memory 80.7
1-Core 174
2-Core 344
105% 200 Pts
4-Core 672
8-Core 1,308
117% 990 Pts
64-Core 2,503
155% 2,503 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 103%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$510
Asus(1043 8747) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
101% Outstanding
Lighting 121
Reflection 112
Parallax 125
99% 119 fps
MRender 180
Gravity 113
Splatting 104
105% 132 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 101%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 240GB 240GB
223GB free
Firmware: S0110A0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 509
Write 402
Mixed 345
93% 418 MB/s
4K Read 31.5
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 27
138% 54.2 MB/s
DQ Read 66.2
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 0.4
59% 133 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 90%
Timetec MS10 1TB
111GB free
Firmware: 32A0T54B
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,579
Write 1,996
Mixed 1,463
446% 2,013 MB/s
4K Read 62.5
4K Write 173
4K Mixed 88
299% 108 MB/s
DQ Read 1,264
DQ Write 1,032
DQ Mixed 509
555% 935 MB/s
Poor: 105% Great: 264%
Hitachi HUS724040ALE640 4TB
2TB free
Firmware: MJAOA580
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 124
Write 137
Mixed 67.5
81% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.8
171% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 45% Great: 92%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
151GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 02.01A02
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 156
Write 166
Mixed 97.2
104% 140 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.1
219% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 109%
Mass Storage Device 1TB
998GB free, PID 1212
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 0.8
Write 0.5
Mixed 0.7
1% 0.67 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
3% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 26%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 2400 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
90.7% Outstanding
MC Read 39.3
MC Write 30.4
MC Mixed 31.1
96% 33.6 GB/s
SC Read 23.7
SC Write 17.9
SC Mixed 29.3
68% 23.6 GB/s
Latency 80.8
50% 80.8 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 90.7%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 50 15 60 21.5" 1280 720 SAM063F SMB2230
Typical X470 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B79) Builds (Compare 4,943 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: MSI X470 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B79)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $451
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback