MSI MS-16J2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics17.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive66.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
1 month ago, 1 month ago.
SystemMicro-Star GE62 2QC
MotherboardMSI MS-16J2  (all builds)
Memory4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160705
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 23 '24 at 15:37
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User LTU-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 0.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
45.9% Average
Memory 75.2
1-Core 33.4
2-Core 60
39% 56.2 Pts
4-Core 94.7
8-Core 123
14% 109 Pts
64-Core 133
8% 133 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960M
MSI(1462 1138) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.2737
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
17.7% Very poor
Lighting 22.2
Reflection 25.4
Parallax 20.5
18% 22.7 fps
MRender 24.3
Gravity 22.8
Splatting 16.7
17% 21.3 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 17.7%
Great: 18%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFS128G39MNC-3310A 128GB
79GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20001P00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 306 309 303 288 222 151 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
66.7% Good
Read 441
Write 311
Mixed 282
SusWrite 263
72% 324 MB/s
4K Read 20.7
4K Write 36.3
4K Mixed 22.2
79% 26.4 MB/s
DQ Read 229
DQ Write 160
DQ Mixed 153
126% 181 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 92%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
827GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 125 125 128 126 125 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
73.4% Very good
Read 130
Write 120
Mixed 26.2
SusWrite 126
73% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
119% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston MSI16D3LS1MNG/8G 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
24.1% Poor
MC Read 8.4
MC Write 8.1
MC Mixed 7
22% 7.83 GB/s
SC Read 7
SC Write 7.7
SC Mixed 8.2
22% 7.63 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 24.1%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 112 36 60 15.5" 1280 720 CMN15D2
Typical MS-16J2 Builds (Compare 320 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-16J2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback