Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	18.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	28.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20240318
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 23 '24 at 14:43
Run Duration	149 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	16%

PC Performing as expected (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395 197,342 User benchmarks, average bench 88% AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	84.4% Excellent	Memory 68 1-Core 134 2-Core 269 84% 157 Pts	4-Core 539 8-Core 1,026 93% 782 Pts	64-Core 2,178 135% 2,178 Pts
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 84.4% Great: 97%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P620 6,548 User benchmarks, average bench 18% HP(103C 1264) 2GB CLim: 1354 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 551.86 Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	18.5% Very poor	Lighting 22.6 Reflection 27.5 Parallax 20 18% 23.4 fps	MRender 24.8 Gravity 21.4 Splatting 22.1 18% 22.8 fps
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 18.5% Great: 19%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 152GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT04B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 517 Write 494 Mixed 451 109% 487 MB/s	4K Read 47 4K Write 115 4K Mixed 63.9 214% 75.3 MB/s	DQ Read 388 DQ Write 363 DQ Mixed 372 280% 374 MB/s
Poor: 75% Great: 128%
SanDisk Ultra 32GB 8,520 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 20GB free, PID null Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 36.8 Write 19 Mixed 23.2 31% 26.3 MB/s	4K Read 5.9 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 2.9 188% 3.6 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 36%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G Skill Intl F4-3200C16-16GTZR 2x16GB 10,357 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	76.6% Very good	MC Read 29.4 MC Write 27.1 MC Mixed 27.7 80% 28.1 GB/s	SC Read 21.4 SC Write 18.2 SC Mixed 27.1 64% 22.2 GB/s	Latency 108 37% 108 ns
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 76.6% Great: 113%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	70	58	60	24.1"	1280 720	DELA07A DELL U2412M

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING B550-PLUS Builds (Compare 7,915 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 142%

UFO

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS

CPU
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $119Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	2,628x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $175Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	1,228x
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $83Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	855x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	825x
RTX 3060Nvidia $250Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	702x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	623x

SSD
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $94Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	311x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $96Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	306x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $107Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	276x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	376x
KF3200C16D4/8GX 2x8GBKingstonBench 88%, 58,684 samples	223x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	205x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $753

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16