To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 34% Sail boat	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 27% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	45.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	To Be Filled By O.E.M. (all builds)
Memory	8.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191029
Uptime	2.7 Days
Run Date	Apr 23 '24 at 13:27
Run Duration	143 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	26%

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3820 38,674 User benchmarks, average bench 70% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	71.1% Very good	Memory 89.8 1-Core 85.3 2-Core 178 69% 118 Pts	4-Core 285 8-Core 420 44% 353 Pts	64-Core 396 24% 396 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 71.1% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP 26,532 User benchmarks, average bench 41% AMD(1002 0B31) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1206 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.11.1 Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	45.2% Average	Lighting 56.9 Reflection 56.3 Parallax 76.6 46% 63.3 fps	MRender 57.9 Gravity 61.9 Splatting 41.7 43% 53.8 fps
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 45.2% Great: 48%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB 80,540 User benchmarks, average bench 217% 80GB free (System drive) Firmware: 4L2QEXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,516 Write 1,536 Mixed 1,224 318% 1,425 MB/s	4K Read 32.4 4K Write 70.3 4K Mixed 42.9 141% 48.5 MB/s	DQ Read 511 DQ Write 317 DQ Mixed 447 324% 425 MB/s
Poor: 130% Great: 296%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23 574,344 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 273GB free Firmware: KC65 SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 83 92 90 80 85 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	48.6% Average	Read 83.2 Write 106 Mixed 53.1 SusWrite 86.3 60% 82.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.7 121% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 48.6% Great: 88%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23 574,344 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 198GB free Firmware: KC65 SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 100 100 98 101 97 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	57.6% Above average	Read 102 Write 94.6 Mixed 55 SusWrite 98.8 64% 87.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.8 132% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 57.6% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5173EB0- M378B5173DB0- M378B5173EB0- M378B5273DH0- 16GB 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	66.2% Good	MC Read 24.1 MC Write 27 MC Mixed 23.6 71% 24.9 GB/s	SC Read 12.7 SC Write 12.8 SC Mixed 11.2 35% 12.2 GB/s	Latency 69.4 58% 69.4 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	66	52	240	27"	1280 720	AOC2702 27G2G8

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,598 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

CPU
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	718x
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	281x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	267x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	618x
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	461x
G41 Express ChipsetIntelBench 0%, 33,874 samples	361x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	137x
256GB 256GBSSDBench 77%, 9,229 samples	103x
128GB 128GBSSDBench 65%, 7,332 samples	90x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	500x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	304x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	227x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $87

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16