Asrock X670E Taichi

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 400%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 120%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 404%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 121%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics345% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive573% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemAsrock X670E Taichi  (all builds)
MotherboardASRock X670E Taichi
Memory59.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240326
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 23 '24 at 09:05
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D-$310
AM5, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
121% Outstanding
Memory 98.4
1-Core 198
2-Core 394
122% 230 Pts
4-Core 773
8-Core 1,398
130% 1,085 Pts
64-Core 1,790
111% 1,790 Pts
Poor: 105%
This bench: 121%
Great: 122%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,760
Asus(1043 889C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3150 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
345% Outstanding
Lighting 543
Reflection 710
Parallax 632
442% 628 fps
MRender 477
Gravity 516
Splatting 277
332% 423 fps
Poor: 303%
This bench: 345%
Great: 407%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT1000T700SSD3 1TB
824GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PACR5103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2187 1724 1718 1739 1747 1741 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
573% Outstanding
Read 6,739
Write 7,460
Mixed 3,576
SusWrite 1,809
1,094% 4,896 MB/s
4K Read 73.4
4K Write 239
4K Mixed 113
382% 142 MB/s
DQ Read 1,923
DQ Write 1,416
DQ Mixed 1,810
1,315% 1,717 MB/s
Poor: 434%
This bench: 573%
Great: 723%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F5-6000J3040G32G 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
210% Outstanding
MC Read 83.3
MC Write 68.4
MC Mixed 75.4
216% 75.7 GB/s
SC Read 65.7
SC Write 73.6
SC Mixed 62.1
192% 67.1 GB/s
Latency 41.1
97% 41.1 ns
Poor: 152%
This bench: 210%
Great: 285%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 240 31.5" 1280 720 SAM7257 Odyssey G8
Typical X670E Taichi Builds (Compare 54 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 289%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 294%
UFO

System: Asrock X670E Taichi

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $1,310
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback