Monster TULPAR T7 V20.5

Performance Results


Gaming 14% Tree trunk	Desktop 52% Yacht	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 47%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	9.94% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	138% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Run History

12 months ago, 12 months ago, 11 days ago, 11 days ago, 10 days ago.

System	Monster TULPAR T7 V20.5 (all builds)
Motherboard	MONSTER TULPAR T7 V20.5
Memory	23 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk,
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20220824
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Apr 22 '24 at 22:08
Run Duration	120 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-12700H 52,857 User benchmarks, average bench 97% U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 1.05 GHz (avg) Relative performance (0^th percentile)	47% Average	Memory 50.8 1-Core 60.4 2-Core 122 44% 77.8 Pts	4-Core 244 8-Core 281 34% 262 Pts	64-Core 355 22% 355 Pts
Poor: 91% ↑ This bench: 47% Great: 102%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Device(1D05 1174) 1GB Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4502 Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	9.94% Terrible	Lighting 10.7 Reflection 17.4 Parallax 15.4 9% 14.5 fps	MRender 18.1 Gravity 14.6 Splatting 13.3 12% 15.3 fps
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 9.94% Great: 21%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ1T0HBLB-00B00 1TB 7,795 User benchmarks, average bench 205% 775GB free (System drive) Firmware: FXM7401Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 774 820 803 831 867 882 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	138% Outstanding	Read 1,077 Write 764 Mixed 892 SusWrite 830 200% 891 MB/s	4K Read 29.9 4K Write 42.4 4K Mixed 33.9 111% 35.4 MB/s	DQ Read 331 DQ Write 113 DQ Mixed 221 164% 222 MB/s
Poor: 132% ↑ This bench: 138% Great: 283%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A2K43EB1-CWE 2x16GB 6,443 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 2 of 2 slots used 32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	84.9% Excellent	MC Read 33.3 MC Write 35.5 MC Mixed 33.8 98% 34.2 GB/s	SC Read 10.4 SC Write 14.4 SC Mixed 14.6 38% 13.1 GB/s	Latency 183 22% 183 ns
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 84.9% Great: 106%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	67	55	144	17.2"	1920 1080	CMN175C

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TULPAR T7 V20.5 Builds (Compare 357 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 91%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 95%

Nuclear submarine

System: Monster TULPAR T7 V20.5

CPU
Core i7-12700HIntelBench 97%, 52,857 samples	357x

GPU
RTX 3060 (Laptop)NvidiaBench 90%, 102,706 samples	200x
Iris Xe GraphicsIntelBench 16%, 72,765 samples	130x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 15%, 7,232 samples	27x

SSD
MZVLQ1T0HBLB-00B00 1TBSamsungBench 205%, 7,795 samples	52x
P2 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBCrucial $75Bench 200%, 52,084 samples	40x
MZVLQ512HBLU-00B00 512GBSamsungBench 166%, 12,842 samples	38x

RAM
M471A2K43EB1-CWE 2x16GBSamsungBench 87%, 6,443 samples	37x
M471A1K43EB1-CWE 2x8GBSamsungBench 86%, 38,732 samples	32x
CT16G4SFRA32A.C8FF 2x16GBCrucialBench 81%, 1,972 samples	31x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16