| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
| Graphics | 68.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | 75.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Run History
1 month ago, 1 month ago.
| Motherboard | Asrock Z390 Pro4 (all builds) |
| Memory | 26.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20190313 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Apr 22 '24 at 21:49 |
| Run Duration | 117 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 0% |
PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
|
85.7%
Excellent
|
82% 148 Pts
|
73% 585 Pts
|
41% 661 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1660-$200
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 546.29
Performing below potential (63rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
68.8%
Good
|
74% 85.6 fps
|
59% 71.4 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
95GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 267 246 271 276 275 276 MB/s
|
75.5%
Very good
|
72% 321 MB/s
|
90% 32.1 MB/s
|
195% 277 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Corsair CMW32GX4M2E3200C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
71.7%
Very good
|
73% 25.5 GB/s
|
62% 21.8 GB/s
|
51% 77.9 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
| Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0% | 0% | 0 | 70 | 58 | 165 | 23.8" | 1280 720 | AUS242C ASUS VG24VQ1B |
Typical Z390 Pro4 Builds (Compare 4,883 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock Z390 Pro4 - $190
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-9600KIntel $137Bench 93%, 321,194 samples | 1,203x |
| Core i7-9700KIntel $264Bench 97%, 550,833 samples | 1,132x |
| Core i9-9900KIntel $429Bench 98%, 354,223 samples | 534x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples | 380x |
| RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples | 340x |
| RTX 2060Nvidia $287Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 318x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 127% - Outstanding | Total price: $670 |