HP EliteBook 840 14 inch G9 Notebook PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics14.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP EliteBook 840 14 inch G9 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 896D
Memory9.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231005
Uptime11.3 Days
Run DateApr 22 '24 at 21:31
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 41%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1240P
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
67.1% Good
Memory 51.2
1-Core 124
2-Core 264
75% 146 Pts
4-Core 468
8-Core 519
65% 493 Pts
64-Core 910
56% 910 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 67.1%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
HP(103C 896D) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4887
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
14.9% Very poor
Lighting 17.4
Reflection 18.9
Parallax 20.7
14% 19 fps
MRender 17.5
Gravity 28.2
Splatting 15.5
16% 20.4 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 14.9%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SK hynix PC801 HFS256GEJ9X101N 256GB
192GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 865 739 1049 726 406 398 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Write 990
Mixed 816
SusWrite 697
194% 834 MB/s
DQ Read 544
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 171
177% 300 MB/s
4K Write 79.5
4K Mixed 52.8
165% 66.2 MB/s
Poor: 75% Great: 401%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M425R2GA3BB0-CQKOL 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
63% Good
MC Read 23.6
MC Write 23.4
MC Mixed 23.7
67% 23.6 GB/s
SC Read 10.6
SC Write 23.1
SC Mixed 14.8
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 135
30% 135 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 63%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 55 60 14" 1280 720 BOE0A05
Typical EliteBook 840 14 inch G9 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 313 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

System: HP EliteBook 840 14 inch G9 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback