Lenovo 83ER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics7.86% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive117% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 83ER  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory1.4 GB free of 8 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230630
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateApr 22 '24 at 20:36
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12450H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
71% Very good
Memory 50
1-Core 170
2-Core 310
90% 177 Pts
4-Core 496
8-Core 698
75% 597 Pts
64-Core 915
57% 915 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 71%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Legend(17AA 384A) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4502
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
7.86% Terrible
Lighting 7.8
Reflection 11
Parallax 10.2
6% 9.67 fps
MRender 12.3
Gravity 14.6
Splatting 12.7
11% 13.2 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.86%
Great: 15%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron MTFDKCD512QFM-1BD1AABLA 512GB
298GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1002V3LN
SusWrite @10s intervals: 730 811 957 798 139 76 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 666
Write 973
Mixed 682
SusWrite 585
164% 726 MB/s
4K Read 45.1
4K Write 93
4K Mixed 9.9
130% 49.3 MB/s
DQ Read 566
DQ Write 283
DQ Mixed 486
345% 445 MB/s
Poor: 83%
This bench: 117%
Great: 252%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron MT62F1G32D4DR-031 4x2GB
4 of 8 slots used
8GB Row of chips 23h 6400 MHz clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (92nd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
77.4% Very good
MC Read 28.6
MC Write 31.3
MC Mixed 28.1
84% 29.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 28.7
SC Mixed 17.6
57% 19.8 GB/s
Latency 162
25% 162 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 77.4%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 22 2 60 15.5" 1280 720 LEN9051
Typical 83ER Builds (Compare 87 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 83ER

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback